[02:41:45] <wm-bb>	 <Disk> Oops, sorry for my inappropriate wording above. (re @andreklapper: (Sidenote: Please see also https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Inclusive_language - thanks! :))
[02:42:53] <wm-bb>	 <Disk> Now that PR has been merged and published on npm:
[02:42:54] <wm-bb>	 <Disk> https://www.npmjs.com/package/@types/oojs
[02:42:55] <wm-bb>	 <Disk> I hope people working on gadgets and user scripts will soon benefit from this
[03:27:37] <wm-bb>	 <Romilda> Hi, I'm looking for a guy.
[03:32:09] * AntiComposite sighs
[12:57:21] <wm-bb>	 <Thecladis> I am not particulaely familiar with typescript. I believe it has to be compliled into js by webpack or something rather than interpreted in the browser directly, does't it? That does not seem particularly convenient for user scripts, although there are a few complex one that are created a similar way and managed though a git repo (re @Disk: Now that PR has been merged and published on npm:
[12:57:22] <wm-bb>	 <Thecladis> https://www.npmjs.com/package/@types/oojs
[12:57:24] <wm-bb>	 <Thecladis> I hope people working on gadgets and...)
[13:20:06] <wm-bb>	 <lucaswerkmeister> Disk it looks like a lot of the doc comments are directly copy+pasted from OOjs? I’m not sure that’s okay license-wise…
[13:23:14] <wm-bb>	 <Disk> Thanks for mentioning this. It looks like OOjs and DT are both licensed under MIT, so I believe this is not a big issue... (re @lucaswerkmeister: Disk it looks like a lot of the doc comments are directly copy+pasted from OOjs? I’m not sure that’s okay license-wise…)
[13:24:21] <wm-bb>	 <lucaswerkmeister> but OOjs is “Copyright 2011-2017 OOjs Team and other contributors.” and “The above copyright notice … shall be
[13:24:22] <wm-bb>	 <lucaswerkmeister> included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.”
[13:24:27] <wm-bb>	 <lucaswerkmeister> I don’t think MIT licenses are just freely interchangeable
[13:25:16] <wm-bb>	 <Disk> You are right, it needs to be fixed
[13:43:15] <wm-bb>	 <Disk> I have posted about this issue at: https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/discussions/63229 (re @lucaswerkmeister: but OOjs is “Copyright 2011-2017 OOjs Team and other contributors.” and “The above copyright notice … shall be
[13:43:15] <wm-bb>	 <Disk> included in all c...)
[14:10:41] <wm-bb>	 <Disk> Yes, but what I was writing is called "type declarations" which is aimed at providing better DX (intellisense, type inference, etc.) by describing the shape of an existing JavaScript library, which people working with JavaScript would also benefits from (re @Thecladis: I am not particulaely familiar with typescript. I believe it has to be compliled into js by webpack or something <clipped message>
[14:10:42] <wm-bb>	 <Disk>  rather than int...)
[14:42:04] <wm-bb>	 <Thecladis> So it is not some set of objects to be used directly but basically just some metadata? (re @Disk: Yes, but what I was writing is called "type declarations" which is aimed at providing better DX (intellisense, type inference, e...)
[15:07:58] <wm-bb>	 <Thecladis> Lately I am writing userscripts in a PHPStorm scratchpad of an opened mediawiki core, that does provide some IDE help to write code
[20:19:05] <wm-bb>	 <nzprpggyau7> ♾👄♾I know a usdt project, free exposure to profit, no investment, no risk Get to channel: In the BioTG： Lisa0775