[02:54:54] Some wikis had deployed dark mode gadgets [02:55:05] Shall someone clean them up? [02:56:05] Now that built-in dark mode becomes available [05:50:20] That's experimental as of now (Not Stable) (re @cvictorovich: Now that built-in dark mode becomes available) [05:50:48] But it conflicts with the gadget (re @Kuldeepburjbhalaike: That's experimental as of now (Not Stable)) [05:54:03] If anyone using one of them, they can turn it off (re @cvictorovich: But it conflicts with the gadget) [05:54:30] I used them and took some time to turn them off [05:54:58] Ideally a GIE would delete these gadgets from affected sites [06:01:33] I don't think it makes sense Until we get a stable version (re @cvictorovich: Ideally a GIE would delete these gadgets from affected sites) [06:04:57] However I have to say that it’s working poorly on Wikidata (re @Kuldeepburjbhalaike: I don't think it makes sense Until we get a stable version) [06:07:21] Gadget? Works fine for me (almost 95% times) (re @cvictorovich: However I have to say that it’s working poorly on Wikidata) [06:07:57] No, the built in dark mode (re @Kuldeepburjbhalaike: Gadget? Works fine for me (almost 95% times)) [06:08:26] As for the gadget, only less than 10 sites deployed it [06:09:08] Yeah, it's in beta, it'll improve with the time (re @cvictorovich: No, the built in dark mode) [09:57:44] In general Telegram moderation is a dumpster fire, and I don't think channel moderators are even made aware of central moderation actions. Maybe someone reported a lot of your comments and the server decided you are a spammer, or something. (re @bozzy: Thanks 🙏 So I'm not crazy. [09:57:44] Now, there is the question of why they were eliminated from this side. [09:57:46] I think I will never get an an...) [13:22:25] A new Wikipedia article for the museum in Tallinn some of us visited - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banned_Books_Museum [13:34:30] One in Spanish too, seemingly [13:34:37] With a really messed up lead image in the infobox - https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Museo_de_los_libros_prohibidos [13:36:30] Or maybe just messed up using parsoid? :D [13:42:14] Nope, it's timeless [13:50:53] Madamebiblio is editing it 😃 [13:52:13] what's the problem with the image? (re @tehreedy: With a really messed up lead image in the infobox - https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Museo_de_los_libros_prohibidos) [13:52:36] It’s mahussive [13:53:16] https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/546f6356/file_60862.jpg [13:53:57] a wikimedian is actively working in the article, if is what are you asking about :m (re @tehreedy: ) [13:54:25] It’s fine on Vector (re @tehreedy: ) [13:56:45] seems https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plantilla:Ficha/imagelimit.css isn't working (re @tehreedy: It’s fine on Vector) [13:57:03] Bugs? In Wikipedia wikis? [13:57:32] i understand the intention (dynamic sizing), but isn't loading the full-size image for every(?) infobox and then downscaling it a massive waste of resource? [13:58:19] Certainly for the clients it is [14:01:00] The tech to let the client decide which image size to load is called srcset [15:13:10] mediawiki pages msite on my phone are looking like this :-( : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/d75d6d67/file_60863.jpg [15:14:06] Does the infobox have class infobox? [16:06:29] me. I'm making the 6 airplanes count (re @lcawte: Got home an hour ago. Thanks for a great hackathon all 😅 [16:06:29] Anyone else still not home yet?)