[03:08:46] I think Special:Block is the only part of core that outright requires JS, and there's always been a plan to implement it in Codex-PHP (which wasn't available when we built the Vue form, but it was thought that admins all rely on JS for so many things that it'd be okay). (re @ChlodAlejandro: Try it out and see what happens. FWIW, a lot of basic functionality on [03:08:46] MediaWiki like logg [03:08:47] ing in, reading and editing work witho...) [03:10:01] the whole no-JS thing is still a pretty central tenet of mediawiki development, I think (or I hope!) [09:16:56] Aha. I’ve long been using ublock Origin (re @jeremy_b: yes try it and see, addon installation and removal are cheap and you can do it in a separate testing browser profile if you want...) [09:17:08] For Chrome, lite (re @cvictorovich: Aha. I’ve long been using ublock Origin) [09:18:28] It’s functioning very well (re @cvictorovich: Aha. I’ve long been using ublock Origin) [09:19:11] Tor browser includes NoScript by default, hence I got to know it [09:21:06] MV3 is a trash, which lynches ad blockers (re @cvictorovich: For Chrome, lite) [09:22:38] Loading custom rules has been disallowed (re @cvictorovich: For Chrome, lite) [09:23:41] Still almost all gadgets are written in JS [11:58:11] which one are not? just curious- (re @cvictorovich: Still almost all gadgets are written in JS) [12:02:53] I’m unsure (re @IsmaelOlea: which one are not? just curious-) [12:08:25] ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ [12:55:15] This is for precision: I don’t know if there are any gadgets not written in JS (re @cvictorovich: Still almost all gadgets are written in JS) [13:00:08] The English Wikipedia has a bunch, usually for appearance changes. You can find them at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Gadgets-definition#appearance (re @IsmaelOlea: which one are not? just curious-) [14:34:46] I think "lynch" is not a word to use casually FYI. might as well have said "destroyed". (re @cvictorovich: MV3 is a trash, which lynches ad blockers) [14:37:57] Refactored (re @jeremy_b: I think "lynch" is not a word to use casually FYI. might as well have said "destroyed".) [15:55:06] but they are always made in js, aren't they? (re @ChlodAlejandro: The English Wikipedia has a bunch, usually for appearance changes. You can find them at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:...) [17:57:56] γρηγ