[00:28:35] <wikibugs>	 10Machine-Learning-Team, 10MediaWiki-extensions-ORES, 10CheckUser, 10Commons, and 30 others: WikiPage::doEditContent falls back to $wgUser - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T255507 (10DannyS712)
[01:15:39] <wikibugs>	 10Machine-Learning-Team, 10MediaWiki-extensions-ORES, 10CheckUser, 10Commons, and 30 others: WikiPage::doEditContent falls back to $wgUser - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T255507 (10DannyS712)
[01:53:57] <wikibugs>	 10Machine-Learning-Team, 10MediaWiki-extensions-ORES, 10CheckUser, 10Commons, and 30 others: WikiPage::doEditContent falls back to $wgUser - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T255507 (10DannyS712) The core patch is ready to go, but cannot be merged until after CentralNotice syncs the `wmf_deploy` branch to...
[04:33:29] <wikibugs>	 10Machine-Learning-Team, 10MediaWiki-extensions-ORES, 10CheckUser, 10Commons, and 30 others: WikiPage::doEditContent falls back to $wgUser - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T255507 (10DannyS712) >>! In T255507#7182694, @DannyS712 wrote: > The core patch is ready to go, but cannot be merged until after Ce...
[14:45:41] <elukey>	 as FYI Mediawiki is now serving from codfw
[15:38:02] <elukey>	 ok so I added some psp manually to the eqiad prod cluster and the istiod pod was created, but then I see
[15:38:05] <elukey>	 pkica	Failed to get secret (error: Get "https://10.64.77.1:443/api/v1/namespaces/istio-system/secrets/istio-ca-secret": x509: cannot validate certificate for 10.64.77.1 because it doesn't contain any IP SANs), will create one
[15:38:29] <elukey>	 the ip is the kube-api, really weird
[15:38:47] <elukey>	 I wasn't even aware that istiod was creating a CA behind the scenes
[16:04:45] <accraze>	 o/
[16:14:17] <accraze>	 i'm working through our blubber/prod image and deploy pipeline stuff, starting to think the mono repo structure is not a long term solution for the inference services
[16:16:14] <accraze>	 it might be cleaner/easier to maintain with repos separated by image (editquality, articlequality, outlink-topics, etc. )
[16:16:33] <accraze>	 and then handle individual services via helm
[16:20:59] <elukey>	 o/
[16:21:39] <elukey>	 accraze: but if we have one repo with separate dirs with blubber configs etc..? would it be ok ?
[16:22:04] <elukey>	 I am asking since if we have to create a repo every time it might be confusing for us and people sending patches etc..
[16:22:20] <elukey>	 (not sure if it makes sense, lemme know)
[16:25:35] <accraze>	 elukey: that's what i'm looking into today, for now it's probably best to keep the monorepo if we can, but depending on how the individual service deployments go, things might get a bit messy with all the different reqs for pipeline configs 
[16:26:20] <accraze>	 hoping to have a rough draft of the blubber/pipeline config to share tomorrow in the team meeting tomorrow
[16:30:31] <elukey>	 accraze: sure! if it gets messy splitting is surely ok, I can help to brainbounce if needed :)
[16:51:48] <anubhav_sharma>	 Hello everyone , so this is regarding the Wikimedia API to retrieve text by comparing same revids . If I use the "action" compare for same revision Ids ( I used a relative marker in the script mentioning about the prev revision). My doubt is that in that way , I cannot get the content ( main textual change ) for the revision as it says unrecognised value for parameter "prop" content
[16:54:13] <anubhav_sharma>	 @greg-g: how do I get it for free like how do I join there group plan?
[17:18:17] <elukey>	 going afk, ttl!
[17:29:41] <anubhav_sharma>	 No issues . Thank you @elukey 
[17:40:03] <greg-g>	 anubhav_sharma: my apologies, the group plan is for WMF Staff. I thought you were a new staff member! :) Hopefully the free plan from irccloud is sufficient for you.
[17:43:34] <anubhav_sharma>	 Yeah it's working well till now :)
[18:41:45] <chrisalbon>	 awesome good to hear
[20:51:31] <wikibugs>	 10Lift-Wing, 10artificial-intelligence, 10articlequality-modeling, 10revscoring, 10Machine-Learning-Team (Active Tasks): Create a KFServing model server for articlequality models - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T284678 (10ACraze) Thinking about feature parity with ORES, we will want to include some p...