[10:50:08] <kostajh>	 hi, does someone here have the answer to this question? https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:X32hnbjtko7b67ds
[12:25:10] <Krinkle>	 kostajh: I believe the answer is the latter, it's just saying that when (already) doing writes to use deferred for non critical ones. We no longer have an aim to fully remove deferred writes on GET, other than to take into account the caveats at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Job_queue/For_developers#Which_one_to_use? This page and our guides like https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Performance_Team/Backend_performance are 
[12:25:10] <Krinkle>	 more up to date.
[12:27:03] <kostajh>	 ack, thanks
[12:27:05] <Krinkle>	 In a nut shell: it's within the contract to  silently skip/tail deferred writes on GET, so be prepared for that. Generally I'd use it for: rare circumstances where you want to enhance the scenario with a small/fast write that would ideally happen right away.
[12:27:08] <kostajh>	 ^ cc tgr_