[19:27:14] <urbanecm>	 @test
[19:27:17] <urbanecm>	 @ping
[19:27:34] <urbanecm>	 !test is testing
[19:27:34] <wm-bot>	 Key was added
[19:27:39] <urbanecm>	 !test del
[19:27:39] <wm-bot>	 Successfully removed test
[19:27:49] <urbanecm>	 apergos: appears to be back and responsive. 
[19:28:11] <apergos>	 thanks. I wonder why it left in the first place
[19:28:26] <apergos>	 lens0021: logging back to normal
[19:31:57] <urbanecm>	 Not sure apergos. Probably some issues either at Libera or WMCS. 
[19:32:26] <apergos>	 guess we'll have to keep an eye out for this for the next little while
[19:42:15] <Platonides>	 libera servers seem a bit unstable
[19:49:22] <apergos>	 it's early days yet
[20:21:25] <legoktm>	 qchris: if you're around, I could use your input on where in the Gerrit hiearchy to put a Git repository that will contain IRC ACL configuration, e.g. https://gitlab.com/legoktm/ircservserv/-/blob/master/data/mediawiki.toml
[20:22:16] <legoktm>	 I'll need two repos, one for the software and then another for the config...
[20:23:34] <qchris>	 Not sure I know a good place for that ... Let me take a look.
[20:26:07] <qchris>	 legoktm: ircservserv will be a bot, right? Will it run in labs (mmhmmm... or maybe production?)?
[20:27:29] <legoktm>	 yes and I'm not sure tbh, I could see it ending up in either depending what level of access we give it
[20:29:52] <qchris>	 If we aim for labs, then I'd probably default to labs/tools/ircservserv and labs/tools/ircservserv/config otherwise ... would it fit under operations (E.g.: operations/software/ircservserv?)
[20:30:44] <qchris>	 But I've learnt the other day that you know our gerrit's hierarchy far better than me, so I'm all ears for suggestions.
[20:31:43] <legoktm>	 I think operations/software/ircservserv makes sense, but adding /config to that feels weird
[20:32:04] <qchris>	 Would the config fit into the puppet repo?
[20:32:27] <qchris>	 Because if it's production, it's probably getting deployed through puppet?
[20:33:52] <legoktm>	 yes but no. the problem with puppet is only SRE's have +2 there and I want to have this managed by IRC Ops, not SRE
[20:34:12] <qchris>	 Yes, makes sense.
[20:35:13] <apergos>	 a few otherpeople have +2 inpuppet but yeah, it's a pretty broad privilege to have just for one config
[20:35:53] <legoktm>	 I'm kind of tempted to have wikimedia/irc/iss-config or something
[20:36:30] <Platonides>	 iss ?
[20:36:43] <urbanecm>	 legoktm: ad "adding config to it feels weird", we have operations/mediawiki-config
[20:36:54] <urbanecm>	 so maybe operations/irc-config can work
[20:36:59] <legoktm>	 "ircservserv" shortens to iss, but we can spell it out the full thing
[20:37:03] <Platonides>	 a wikimedia/irc namespace looks good
[20:37:17] <urbanecm>	 +1 to Platonides 
[20:39:36] <legoktm>	 wikimedia/irc/ircservserv (I am also not 100% attached to that name, I just thought it was funny at like 2am) and wikimedia/irc/config ? or should it be ircservserv-config?
[20:40:47] <Platonides>	 no opinion on the project name
[20:40:48] <qchris>	 I'm cool with wikimedia/irc/...  but I'd add ircservserv or iss or some qualifier to the config repo. Like the ircservserv-config you suggested.
[20:44:54] <legoktm>	 sounds good then
[20:45:08] <legoktm>	 should I make a request on-wiki just for recording this?
[20:45:35] <qchris>	 If that's not too much bureaucracy, that would be great.
[20:48:40] <legoktm>	 https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?diff=4596113&oldid=4592874&title=Gerrit%2FNew_repositories%2FRequests%2FEntries&type=revision :)
[20:48:59] <qchris>	 Thanks. Gimme a few minutes :-)
[20:49:16] <legoktm>	 the gitlab repo doesn't need to be imported, what I pushed is a giant mess and I want to do a better job for what ends up was the "Initial commit"
[20:49:19] <legoktm>	 ty :D
[20:50:02] <qchris>	 Ok. Was just about to ask about the import :-)
[20:52:57] <qchris>	 legoktm: Repos are ready.
[20:53:22] <legoktm>	 ty! 
[20:53:26] <qchris>	 yw