[07:36:16] <volans>	 ryankemper, gehel: if by any chance any of you might happen to have a minute to double check https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/cookbooks/+/702884 in the next few days that would be great :)
[07:40:11] <ryankemper>	 volans: thanks, looks good at first glance, will take a closer look on wednesday (I’m OOO Tuesday and gehel is OOO all this week)
[07:40:14] <dcausse>	 volans: Guillaume is still on vacations and Ryan is out today
[07:40:36] <volans>	 ryankemper: ack, no hurry, thanks a lot, go to bed! ;)
[07:43:35] <dcausse>	 I don't like the consumer lag graph at https://grafana-rw.wikimedia.org/d/000000591/elasticsearch-mjolnir-bulk-updates it feels like it never commits offsets 
[08:02:03] <zpapierski>	 yep, it's highest it has ever been, but maybe due to backfilling?
[08:02:36] <zpapierski>	 no, I don't think that's the case
[08:05:52] <dcausse>	 switched the metric to kafka_burrow_partition_lag and it looks saner now, previous one was diffing doing kafka_burrow_topic_partition_offset - kafka_burrow_partition_current_offset
[08:06:55] <zpapierski>	 isn't mjolnir DAG off?
[08:07:26] <dcausse>	 I kept it off but these messages are from the transfer_to_es DAG
[08:07:49] <dcausse>	 I'll re-enable mjolnir later today I think
[08:08:26] <zpapierski>	 ah, right
[08:08:43] <dcausse>	 this dashboard should probably renamed, but the topic names still mentions "mjolnir"
[08:08:48] <zpapierski>	 what's that burrow metric?
[08:09:49] <dcausse>	 https://github.com/linkedin/Burrow/wiki I think
[08:15:45] <zpapierski>	 ah, thx
[08:30:28] <zpapierski>	 this one made me laugh - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/wikidata/query/rdf/+/702124
[08:30:51] <zpapierski>	 scala is dangerous :)
[08:34:05] <dcausse>	 yeah :/
[08:34:43] <dcausse>	 tbh now I don't understand why intelliJ suggests to drop the () on parameterless function calls
[08:34:58] <dcausse>	 this is so ambiguous
[08:38:47] <zpapierski>	 in most cases it will be a parameterless function call, I guess it can
[08:38:52] <zpapierski>	 't tell the difference?
[08:44:34] <dcausse>	 I'm not sure that intelliJ suggested me to drop the () in this specific case but it did many other times so I started to have this habit
[08:50:31] <dcausse>	 anyways, params with defaults + syntactic sugars + inexperienced scala developer is not a good mix 
[09:06:13] <zpapierski>	 worst part is that doing this kind of mistakes is how you get experienced
[09:08:34] <zpapierski>	 I recently got back into C++, one can appreciate little to none syntactic sugar in that language
[09:08:40] <zpapierski>	 only hardship, misery and pointer
[09:08:41] <zpapierski>	 s
[09:45:34] <zpapierski>	 break, back after lunch
[10:23:08] <dcausse>	 lunch
[10:28:08] <tanny411>	 gehel, decausse:  T273854 and T283258 have been in needs reporting. Is there anything else I can do about them? Otherwse they could probably be closed.  (No reason, just for clarity.)
[10:28:08] <stashbot>	 T273854: Automate regular WDQS query parsing and data-extraction - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T273854
[10:28:09] <stashbot>	 T283258: Provide a job regularly deleting wdqs processed query after 90 days - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T283258
[10:28:27] <tanny411>	 dcausse^ 
[11:09:05] <gehel>	 tanny411: I'm on vacation this week. I'll close them next week
[11:09:24] <tanny411>	 No problem, sorry to bother!
[17:35:06] <dcausse>	 dinner
[19:04:45] <gehel>	 ryankemper: for tomorrow, can you check on T286061 ? Thanks !
[19:04:46] <stashbot>	 T286061: Switch buffer re-partition - Eqiad Row B - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T286061
[19:13:01] <mpham>	 I am looking at T286368 again, and the link that zbyszko provided: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:$wgEnableScaryTranscluding -- it looks like whatever scary transclusion is, it's something that we provide/support? though i'm looking at the talk page, and it looks like a mixed bag of people making it work or not over the years
[19:13:02] <stashbot>	 T286368: Including scary transclusion contents in search results in CirrusSearch - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T286368
[19:13:33] <mpham>	 wanted to get a better idea if it's something we support or not, and to what capacity, before replying
[21:38:47] <mpham>	 Also, what is the status of the Did You Mean improvements with Glent? I recall the A/B testing being broken for a bit -- did we fix this? T212891 looks all resolved and T212889 looks like it only has one remaining ticket open, but that the code for that has been merged
[21:38:49] <stashbot>	 T212889: [EPIC-ish][Milestone 1] Implement NLP Search Suggestion Method 1 for 10 languages - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T212889
[21:38:49] <stashbot>	 T212891: [EPIC-ish][Milestone 2] Implement NLP Search Suggestion Method 2 for CJK languages - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T212891