[09:03:15] relocating [09:29:30] Errand + lunch [12:08:53] Lunch break [14:17:39] relocating [15:05:21] \p [15:05:23] \o even [15:18:15] ebernhardson: apologies for continuously asking about Search Satisfaction. I can't remember if this is the same or different from User Engagement ( number and percentage of queries with a dwell time > 10 seconds) [15:23:37] mpham: so, i think we decided to just not call the metric "search satisfaction" since there are also other things called that (the schemas, logging code, etc.). I think from the historical docs we agreed it was called User Satisfaction? Names are hard [16:01:53] o/ [16:11:35] dinner time! [16:43:57] thanks erik. i remember now. will make a note somewhere and update relevant docs [16:48:29] I'll call it Search Engagement (until I eventually forget what words mean again) [16:59:53] +1 [18:54:23] did we change the WDQS timeout time recently? (I don't recall this) -- https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Project_chat#Query_Service_Timeout_Change? [19:16:43] mpham: i don't think so, randomly searching my emails i find references back in 2018 that it was 60s: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T179879#4002776 [19:17:01] i can't imagine we ever increased the timeout, that would exacerbate wdqs's ongoing problems :) [19:43:20] i suspect this is not the actual VRAM :) 17M / 17592186044416M VRAM [20:37:21] mpham/ ebernhardson: I took a swing at replying to that user, lmk if I should change anything https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Project_chat#Query_Service_Timeout_Change%3F [20:39:35] ack, my irc notifications are kinda spotty. thanks for checking ebernhardson . your response looks great ryankemper -- thanks! [20:43:55] great! also in other news a little late on my standup notes so those are going up now [22:10:06] ryankemper: anything going on to keep me from doing some reindexing tomorrow and over the weekend? [22:31:55] Trey314159: nope, skies are clear [22:32:52] cool! thanks!