[08:57:52] dcausse: how's app deployment on Flink on staging going? [08:58:32] zpapierski: not started yet, trying to make progress on the blogpost today [08:58:37] ah :) [08:59:36] if you need a review, count on me. If you need a proofread, I'm probably not your best bet :) Trey314159 , on the other hand, is [09:00:17] sure, thanks! [09:53:44] lunch [10:05:55] lunch too! [12:16:15] Break [14:10:40] dcausse: blogpost?!?!? [14:12:42] ottomata: yes, Maryum, Zbyszko and I are working on a blog post, hopefully we can publish it once we go live [14:17:11] we could also do small one earlier to talk about the flink-session-cluster chart as it's ready [14:18:14] or a doc on wikitech might more appropriate probably [14:26:26] dcausse: excited to read [14:27:20] btw this quarter i'm going to be writing a draft of a techincal decision statement for consistent and comprehesive (aka more state changes hopefully content in streams) MW events and would love your help [14:27:36] gotta add a lot of 'why we need this' stuff :) [14:30:08] ottomata: cool! please ping us anytime :) [14:52:18] ottomata: I can give you early preview of mine if you want - that one should be the first in series [14:52:53] (or maybe we should post them as a single one? I don't know, honestly) [15:03:02] Hey team! We have a gaming unmeeting in half an hour. Does anyone have a game to propose? [15:05:04] I but all forgot about games - any game we played (except that game with finding triples, I feel like stupid) is fine with me [15:07:04] likewise, I feel stupid too (this I can survive) but it pumps all my energy :) [15:07:28] yep, that's also true [15:07:34] what was the name of it, btw? [15:09:22] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_(card_game) [15:09:28] ah, thx [15:25:32] \o [15:26:06] o/ [15:26:09] Could try azul, various online versions of it, but its 2-4 players so we usually have too many ppl :P [15:27:29] o/ [18:53:39] zpapierski: dcausse yall working with sarah rodlund on blogposts? [19:02:32] oh nm, i see that you are :) [20:49:34] heh, for whatever reason `horse fly bite` is the most popular query for image results on commons, with almost 50% more users than youtube in second place :) [22:06:26] It looks like a search for `horse fly bite` is in Google's index—first result here: https://www.google.com/search?q=commons.wikimedia.org+Special%3ASearch+%22horse+fly+bite%22 —so, it's a bot! I wonder how it got in their index... [22:07:23] Do you see the same lack of query variation with `horse fly bite` that we've seen before? I bet YoUtUbE has more variety! [22:08:26] hmm, i didn't look :P sec [22:12:41] yea, 1 variant of horse fly bite, ~20 for youtube. People like to throw capitals wherever :) [22:13:08] A-ha! [22:16:52] our favorite website gets a surprisingly low prediction and will be in the final dataset, but looking at MediaSearch it seems we turn up roman numeral references [22:19:11] our something along those lines, i dunno