[10:01:50] <dcausse>	 lunxh
[12:40:28] <inflatador>	 <o/
[12:49:41] <gehel>	 dcausse: could you be ready for our ITC for our 1:1 tomorrow morning?
[12:50:06] <dcausse>	 gehel: sure, I'll prep something
[12:50:11] <dcausse>	 o/
[12:50:21] <gehel>	 dcausse: or do you want to do it live like last time?
[12:50:41] <dcausse>	 sure, live is nice
[12:55:50] <gehel>	 then let's do it live!
[13:24:42] <inflatador>	 https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/puppet/+/946547 small patch to get the codfw flink-zk cluster going
[13:43:59] <inflatador>	 dcausse re: your comment. I thought we needed a zk cluster for codfw as well?
[13:48:08] <dcausse>	 inflatador: my bad, my comment was not very explanatory, meant to name the nodes with *2*00[123] instead of *1*00[123]
[13:48:09] <dcausse>	 codfw nodes generatlly start with a 2
[13:48:09] <inflatador>	 dcausse Oh yeah, thanks. (Can you tell it's Monday morning for me? ;P )
[13:48:09] <dcausse>	 :P
[13:48:41] <inflatador>	 OK, fixed
[14:22:59] <btullis>	 Just checking that someone is aware of this: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T343319 PuppetCertificateAboutToExpire: for `search.svc.${site}.wmnet`
[14:23:25] <gehel>	 ryankemper, inflatador: ^
[14:23:30] <btullis>	 I'm happy to look at it, but I don't want to tread on anyone's toes if it's already  under control.
[14:44:55] <inflatador>	 btullis ACK, I'll check it out
[14:52:17] <inflatador>	 looks like this is how we did it in 2018: https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/puppet/+/454788
[14:53:02] <btullis>	 inflatador: Awesome! Feel free to add me for review/cc etc.
[15:01:39] <gehel>	 ebernhardson, inflatador, pfischer: triage meeting: https://meet.google.com/eki-rafx-cxi
[15:58:50] * ebernhardson is still surprised when docker containers come back up after a reboot
[17:15:54] <dcausse>	 dinner
[17:35:55] <inflatador>	 lunch, back in ~1h
[18:48:45] <inflatador>	 sorry, been back
[20:01:40] <inflatador>	 ryankemper heads-up, reimaged wcqs2001-02 to Bullseye on Friday. Didn't see any issues, so I'm starting wcqs2003 now
[20:02:11] <ryankemper>	 inflatador: ack, so 2001/2002 are back in svc?
[20:03:02] <inflatador>	 ryankemper confirmed
[20:03:30] <ryankemper>	 SGTM
[20:04:47] <inflatador>	 {◕ ◡ ◕}
[20:22:28] <ebernhardson>	 meh...gitlab is annoying :P I was trying to review an MR that has a dozen patches attached so I opened each patch in a new tab. Now i have a dozens tabs with all the same name :P
[20:23:21] <ebernhardson>	 it really feels like gitlab tries hard to not care what a patch is, even though that is the critical unit of work in git
[20:23:51] <ebernhardson>	 s/patch/commit/
[21:41:15] * ebernhardson has now renamed this metric that reports Special:Search load time at least 5 times :P
[23:37:14] <ryankemper>	 ebernhardson: ^ is my big gripe with github/gitlab in general. I feel like they both treat the pull request as the fundamental "unit of work" rather than the commit