[07:08:18] <pfischer>	 o/
[07:08:36] <dcausse>	 o/
[09:29:34] <dcausse>	 errand+lunch
[13:20:19] <inflatador>	 <o/
[13:58:05] <ebernhardson>	 \o
[14:25:38] <dcausse>	 o/
[14:46:33] <ebernhardson>	 hmm, i'm not sure i understand how pending changes works in de.wikipedia.org.  Someone pointed out that https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=M._M._Warburg_%26_CO has `Dörscher` in it, but the search engine does not. That appears to be because they have a "pending change" that does not include it
[14:46:48] <ebernhardson>	 (switch ui from german to notice the extr a"Pending changes" tab next to Read)
[14:49:46] <ebernhardson>	 my best guess is they create new real revisions, but then don't consider that new revision "live"
[15:00:47] <dcausse>	 never heard of this feature?
[15:00:55] <ebernhardson>	 neither have i
[15:02:59] <dcausse>	 we'd have to understand how they do this but this sounds to me pretty weird
[15:05:34] <dcausse>	 oops: https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=pageid%3A446725+D%C3%B6rscher&title=Spezial%3ASuche&profile=default&fulltext=1
[15:05:57] <ebernhardson>	 hmm, pageid not working?
[15:06:07] <dcausse>	 it is but it's getting rewritten
[15:06:08] <ebernhardson>	 also if you quote it it will find it better
[15:06:24] <ebernhardson>	 oh, i totally missed that rewrite
[15:06:27] <ebernhardson>	 it needs better ui :P
[15:06:35] <ebernhardson>	 it's in the "please ignore me" section of the page
[15:06:45] <dcausse>	 Showing results for drescher. No results found for pageid:446725 Dörscher
[15:07:03] <dcausse>	 we should not do this :/
[15:07:13] <ebernhardson>	 yea, perhaps turn off rewrites any time syntax is used?
[15:07:39] <dcausse>	 I thought we did but how come it drops my pageid filter?
[15:07:50] <ebernhardson>	 the page id filter probably doesn't get passed to the suggester
[15:07:55] <ebernhardson>	 then we don't re-attach those bits
[15:08:02] <dcausse>	 should be re-added
[15:08:03] <ebernhardson>	 (fancy query handling could fix that :P)
[15:08:05] <dcausse>	 sigh...
[15:08:08] <ebernhardson>	 oh, it's supposed to
[15:08:17] <dcausse>	 yes I remember something like that
[15:09:03] <ebernhardson>	 i guess we should have an integration test of some sort for that
[15:09:08] <dcausse>	 yes
[15:15:49] * ebernhardson ponders allowing a `;<tz>` suffix on date range queries
[15:16:58] <ebernhardson>	 or i guess we could accept `2025-09-16-0800` which is technically still iso 8601 iirc
[15:18:59] <ebernhardson>	 hmm, no thats just extra complication also fitting it into date math
[16:54:25] <ebernhardson>	 sigh...the fixtures depend on the browser_tests profile, but CI doesn't use FullyFeaturedConfig.php
[16:54:50] <ebernhardson>	 easiest is probably to just a normal profile in tests i guess
[16:57:24] <ebernhardson>	 or maybe have 'public' flags on profiles that limit them from being offered in the api? but that seems roundabout
[16:59:58] <dcausse>	 sigh I thought that this browser_tests profile got only used by cindy :/
[17:00:21] <ebernhardson>	 for the moment i'm rebuilding the fixtures with perfield_builder, but will have to review output to see if its reasonable
[17:00:35] <dcausse>	 sure
[17:00:58] <dcausse>	 dinner
[17:16:31] <ebernhardson>	 hmm, java 25 released. We'll make it to 11 soon enough :P
[19:26:42] * ebernhardson is trying to write documentation for the new creationdate/lasteditdate keywords and...explaining things is hard :P
[19:27:05] <ebernhardson>	 i kinda just want to give a table examples and descriptions of what the example does, but seems too lazy