[04:29:49] 10Puppet, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, 10Instrument-ClientError, 10patch-welcome: Prevent Firefox and Chrome extensions from being able to trigger alerts - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T330680 (10colewhite) There's a few ways we can cut these out. Maybe first try something simple like: ` "must_not":... [04:30:09] 10Puppet, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, 10Instrument-ClientError, 10Observability-Logging, 10patch-welcome: Prevent Firefox and Chrome extensions from being able to trigger alerts - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T330680 (10colewhite) [07:39:46] Netbox: killer feature https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/B4KmbZHO/Peek%202023-02-24%2008-05.gif [07:40:40] On different news, Netbox got bought by IBM: https://twitter.com/beevek/status/1630726466202632194 [09:07:24] 10CAS-SSO, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, 10SRE, 10serviceops-collab, and 3 others: migrate gitlab away from the CAS protocol - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T320390 (10jbond) > @jbond could you have a look at this anytime soon? @demon from my side the change is very minimal, just let me know if you wo... [09:13:12] XioNoX: do you know if that killer feature is a global setting or each user can customize the views? [09:13:30] I'd hope it's per user [09:14:01] but then how I can send you a link and tell you to look at the top-right table if you have a different one there? :D [09:14:25] as for the IBM news... let's keep an eye on it. The prices for netboxlabs are quite high IMHO [09:15:16] I don't think you're supposed to say "look at the top-right table" [09:15:28] as it's only for the dashboard [09:15:34] the main page [09:15:45] but instead send a link to the relevant table [09:15:47] or page [09:16:33] ah sorry I tought you could customize all the views :D [09:17:07] that would have been more funky indeed :) [09:19:28] customisable user view will only be available with the new Netbox on WebSphere bundle pricing :-) [09:30:54] lol [10:42:48] 10Packaging, 10Puppet, 10Infrastructure-Foundations: apt: improve apt failover ochastration - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T330849 (10jbond) p:05Triage→03Medium [11:28:20] 10Packaging, 10Puppet, 10Infrastructure-Foundations: apt: improve apt failover ochastration - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T330849 (10jbond) [13:17:09] 10Packaging, 10Puppet, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, 10Patch-For-Review: apt: improve apt failover ochastration - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T330849 (10Volans) We should find a standard setup for those use cases, I can see Netbox having exactly the same issue/requirement (some puppet-driver resourc... [14:01:42] 10Packaging, 10Puppet, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, 10Patch-For-Review: apt: improve apt failover orchestration - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T330849 (10Aklapper) [15:02:17] 10netbox, 10Infrastructure-Foundations: Netbox in codfw slowness issue - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T330883 (10ayounsi) p:05Triage→03Low [15:08:43] 10SRE-tools, 10Infrastructure-Foundations: Upgrade Fastnetmon to 1.2.4 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T330884 (10ayounsi) [15:13:52] 10SRE-tools, 10Infrastructure-Foundations: Upgrade Fastnetmon to 1.2.4 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T330884 (10ayounsi) [15:26:13] 10SRE-tools, 10SRE, 10Spicerack: Retire sre.aqs.roll-restart cookbook - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T330889 (10MoritzMuehlenhoff) [15:26:23] 10SRE-tools, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, 10SRE, 10Spicerack: Retire sre.aqs.roll-restart cookbook - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T330889 (10MoritzMuehlenhoff) p:05Triage→03Medium [16:05:45] 10Puppet, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, 10SRE: Next steps for Puppet 7 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T330490 (10jhathaway) @jbond SRV support does look interesting, it appears they did some work to make it more production ready, https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/PUP-7550. There are a couple of open... [16:10:40] 10Puppet, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, 10SRE: Next steps for Puppet 7 - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T330490 (10jhathaway) @MoritzMuehlenhoff & @jbond thanks for putting together this plan. I think the plan sounds really sensible. I am particularly curious as to how robust the backward compatibility is... [20:51:58] 10Mail, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, 10SRE, 10Security, 10WMF-NDA: Re-establish DMARC reporting analysis - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T330944 (10jhathaway) [20:53:19] 10Mail, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, 10SRE, 10Security, 10WMF-NDA: Re-establish DMARC reporting analysis - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T330944 (10jhathaway) Quote:{F36887400} [20:54:32] 10Mail, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, 10SRE, 10Security, 10WMF-NDA: Re-establish DMARC reporting analysis - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T330944 (10jhathaway) [20:54:38] 10Mail, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, 10SRE, 10Security, 10WMF-NDA: Re-establish DMARC reporting analysis - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T330944 (10jhathaway) Quote:{F36887400} [20:54:44] 10Mail, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, 10SRE, 10Security, 10WMF-NDA: Re-establish DMARC reporting analysis - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T330944 (10taavi) [20:56:09] jhathaway: should ^ not be procurement? [20:56:20] Fine to ask here because taavi locked [20:56:47] not sure [20:57:30] jhathaway: if it’s a quote, they aren’t normally public in case information on it is privileged [20:57:55] Either account manager info / references / info suppliers don’t expect public [20:57:59] nod, makes sense, is just adding the procument tag sufficient? [20:58:02] no [20:58:10] jhathaway: no, move it to S4 [20:58:16] From S1 space [20:58:21] phabricator access policies are never modified purely by adding/removing tags [20:58:34] taavi: I can think of 1 case [20:58:52] changed to s4, thanks folks [20:59:16] yes there's one very specific exception, but in general that's a good rule to remember [20:59:26] nod [21:00:02] The #permanently-private tag should enforce security tasks are kept private is the one I’m thinking taavi [21:00:05] (that is why it was initially public even through you tagged it WMF-NDA) [21:00:34] got it [21:00:52] Thanks taavi for catching it lightning fast [21:00:59] indeed, thanks [23:48:35] Low priority, but I have a re-rack ticket. DC Ops and I think we have the plan down but if anyone from IF wants to double-check in case we missed anything: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T317816