[09:30:17] <jbond>	 I think its only me and volans in today so suggest we do an async meeting unless i got that wrong
[09:31:02] <volans>	 hello :)
[09:31:46] <volans>	 jbond: agree, I think it's probably just us
[09:32:25] <jbond>	 hi :) and ack
[09:33:42] <jinxer-wm>	 (SystemdUnitFailed) firing: cadvisor.service Failed on urldownloader2001:9100 - https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Monitoring/check_systemd_state - https://grafana.wikimedia.org/d/g-AaZRFWk/systemd-status - https://alerts.wikimedia.org/?q=alertname%3DSystemdUnitFailed
[09:33:50] <volans>	 we don't even have a pad...
[09:38:42] <jinxer-wm>	 (SystemdUnitFailed) resolved: cadvisor.service Failed on urldownloader2001:9100 - https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Monitoring/check_systemd_state - https://grafana.wikimedia.org/d/g-AaZRFWk/systemd-status - https://alerts.wikimedia.org/?q=alertname%3DSystemdUnitFailed
[09:40:54] * jbond fixed 
[09:42:11] <volans>	 <3
[10:41:21] <topranks>	 Missed the convo
[10:41:48] <topranks>	 I’m around too, but agree async might make most sense if it’s just us
[12:10:42] <jbond>	 hi all i thoght id jot down a bit of text gerrit review expectations on my wiki page https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jbond#Gerrit_Review_Expectations let me know if you have any questions/comments is it usefull?  perhaps we could have something similar at least at the infrastructre foundation level? 
[12:15:24] <topranks>	 that's cool John, good to see it clearly expressed.  I think it'd be really useful for new starts for instance.
[12:15:56] <topranks>	 I think team-wide guidelines / "standards" is a good idea though yep, your definitions look like a good place to start I'd say 
[12:16:24] <jbond>	  thanks topranks