[03:03:29] (SystemdUnitFailed) resolved: docker-reporter-base-images.service Failed on build2001:9100 - https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Monitoring/check_systemd_state - https://grafana.wikimedia.org/d/g-AaZRFWk/systemd-status - https://alerts.wikimedia.org/?q=alertname%3DSystemdUnitFailed [07:22:40] 10netbox, 10DC-Ops, 10Infrastructure-Foundations: Netbox device's platform field inconsistency - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T336623 (10ayounsi) @Volans looks like we have consensus, could you take care of implementing the needed fixes? [09:59:49] 10netbox, 10Infrastructure-Foundations: Netbox report test_mgmt_dns_hostname - rq.timeouts.JobTimeoutException - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T341843 (10ayounsi) Not sure i f it's a Netbox or Redis issue :( If the former, the upgrade to 3.6 with T336275 could help. For the latter I tried to dig a bit in... [10:31:12] 10netbox, 10DC-Ops, 10Infrastructure-Foundations: Netbox device's platform field inconsistency - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T336623 (10cmooney) @ayounsi @volans I’m wondering if we should reconsider possibly? I had thought it would be useful to serve our preferred junos image for the ztp stuff. Obvi... [10:32:50] 10netbox, 10DC-Ops, 10Infrastructure-Foundations: Netbox device's platform field inconsistency - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T336623 (10Volans) Can't we use a different image based on the combination of role+device_type (aka model)? [10:34:02] 10netbox, 10DC-Ops, 10Infrastructure-Foundations: Netbox device's platform field inconsistency - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T336623 (10cmooney) @volans yes my bad was just looking we have the model in device type that’s better again. I should think before I type :) [11:14:36] 10netbox, 10DC-Ops, 10Infrastructure-Foundations: Netbox device's platform field inconsistency - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T336623 (10ayounsi) Custom field for a device_type might be the way to go. Digressing but I'm wondering if there would be a similar usage for the servers. For example to store id... [11:18:29] (SystemdUnitFailed) firing: (3) debmonitor-maintenance-gc.service Failed on debmonitor2003:9100 - https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Monitoring/check_systemd_state - https://grafana.wikimedia.org/d/g-AaZRFWk/systemd-status - https://alerts.wikimedia.org/?q=alertname%3DSystemdUnitFailed [12:15:07] 10netbox, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, 10Patch-For-Review: Upgrade Netbox to 3.6.x - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T336275 (10ayounsi) [13:25:50] 10netbox, 10DC-Ops, 10Infrastructure-Foundations: Netbox device's platform field inconsistency - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T336623 (10RobH) >>! In T336623#8856284, @wiki_willy wrote: > Agreed, I don't think there's any need to continue using "platform" in Netbox, especially since more than half the... [13:28:11] I have a new VM requests ticket if anyone is available to approve: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T343715 [13:50:59] 10netbox, 10Infrastructure-Foundations: Should we have two versions of the Juniper QFX5120-48Y in Netbox? - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T331519 (10ayounsi) Had a quick chat with @RobH on -dcops to get it sorted before we deployed new esams. One major usage DCops/procurement have of this data is to verif... [14:58:28] 10SRE-tools, 10Cloud-VPS, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, 10cloud-services-team (FY2023/2024-Q1): Update Spicerack documentation - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T325754 (10fnegri) 05Open→03In progress [14:58:34] 10SRE-tools, 10Cloud-VPS, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, 10Goal, 10cloud-services-team (FY2023/2024-Q1): Improve how we run WMCS cookbooks - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T319401 (10fnegri) [15:19:27] (SystemdUnitFailed) firing: (3) debmonitor-maintenance-gc.service Failed on debmonitor2003:9100 - https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Monitoring/check_systemd_state - https://grafana.wikimedia.org/d/g-AaZRFWk/systemd-status - https://alerts.wikimedia.org/?q=alertname%3DSystemdUnitFailed [15:38:44] for the sre meeting I see some updates from mo.ritz bolded, anyone is familiar with those points and would like to speak for them? [16:32:27] jelto maybe on the gitlab one? ^^^ [16:33:06] volans: I'm familiar with the gitlab runner unpreviliged user namespaces stuff [16:33:27] but is it bolded? it's another font? [16:33:37] good question [16:33:38] unclear :D [16:33:40] seems bolded [16:33:46] but is not [16:33:57] not bolded, other font I guess [16:34:15] it's also not too important, mostly interesting to moritz and your team [16:34:20] problem solved [16:34:21] :D [16:34:21] thx [16:34:38] lol not in time [16:34:40] sorry [16:35:34] np :) [16:37:28] nice catch for the font, was the same font but not "regular"/"normal" but semi-bold :D [16:39:57] maybe moritz was not sure if important or not :P [16:40:31] lol [19:19:28] (SystemdUnitFailed) firing: (3) debmonitor-maintenance-gc.service Failed on debmonitor2003:9100 - https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Monitoring/check_systemd_state - https://grafana.wikimedia.org/d/g-AaZRFWk/systemd-status - https://alerts.wikimedia.org/?q=alertname%3DSystemdUnitFailed [23:23:29] (SystemdUnitFailed) firing: (3) debmonitor-maintenance-gc.service Failed on debmonitor2003:9100 - https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Monitoring/check_systemd_state - https://grafana.wikimedia.org/d/g-AaZRFWk/systemd-status - https://alerts.wikimedia.org/?q=alertname%3DSystemdUnitFailed