[09:43:39] <XioNoX>	 that's the most confusing network map I've seen: https://www.ufinet.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/UfinetMapasWeb0524English-1.pdf
[09:49:09] <elukey>	 seems like the schema for a bgp route reflector :D
[09:50:34] <slyngs>	 Seems like they could have just used a bigger page size. The US links are pretty clever, but why not just show all of South America.
[09:51:29] <slyngs>	 And Peru is there twice for no reason...
[09:53:31] <XioNoX>	 yeah exactly
[10:14:09] <topranks>	 I kinda like it 
[10:15:04] <topranks>	 although yeah the boxes for the US ones kind of work, but I agree it doesn't make so much sense with the others from South America 
[10:15:43] <XioNoX>	 figuring out if Sao Paulo is connected to the neighbor countries is more complex than it should
[10:15:59] <XioNoX>	 topranks: opened https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T389767 for momentum replacement
[10:16:33] <topranks>	 "despite their confusing network map"  hahahahaha 
[10:17:06] <topranks>	 thanks, I'll take a look at them when I get a minute 
[12:17:04] <sukhe>	 XioNoX: thanks for all the reviewing!
[15:05:38] <wikibugs>	 10netops, 06Infrastructure-Foundations, 10ops-drmrs: cr1-drmrs to asw1-b12-drmrs link down - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T389071#10668768 (10RobH) Replacement optics and fiber will arrive on March 26th by end of day.  Not great delivery times considering I chose International Priority DHL.
[16:02:15] <XioNoX>	 volans: https://bugs.isc.org/Public/Ticket/Attachment/366196/228185/0001-DHCP-Option-97-Client-Machine-Identifier-pxe-client-.patch doesn't look too bad
[16:02:26] <XioNoX>	 from https://bugs.isc.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=38110
[16:03:14] <volans>	 thx
[16:16:56] <XioNoX>	 elukey, next time you re-image a supermicro can you ping me so I check if they have option 97 /
[16:16:58] <XioNoX>	 ?
[16:17:16] <elukey>	 definitely
[16:22:05] <XioNoX>	 elukey, volans, topranks: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/dhcp-option82-sunset
[16:31:59] <topranks>	 thanks
[16:34:48] <volans>	 thx
[22:25:18] <swfrench-wmf>	 hello I/F friends - if anyone has context on the current status of switching logstash access over to the `logstash-access` LDAP group, it would be appreciated if you could check and update [0] (e.g., it seems like `wmf` is no longer sufficient on its own?)
[22:25:18] <swfrench-wmf>	 [0] https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Logstash#Authentication