[02:11:07] brett: from https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T298194, "[Moritz] has plans to replace pwstore entirely" [02:11:35] bd808: Thanks for the explanation! And thanks for the revert, my apologies. [02:11:55] legoktm: Aha, thanks! [02:14:11] at work we use https://github.com/mozilla/sops, which is roughly the same as pwstore but supporting more things [02:20:55] legoktm: As I'm unfamiliar with the pwstore process past the wiki article, I may be speaking too far out of my experience here, but the pws code suggests that sops would be an ideal replacement. [02:21:21] AFAICT pws pretty much acts like `pass` but also has some convenience wrapping around e.g. git commands [02:22:47] from my experience, I think so too. I don't know if Moritz had anything more in mind than a simple tooling change for this though [02:23:18] at the time that ticket was filed, I had suggested using `age` rather than PGP because it could use SSH keys for encryption, and we already have a process/workflow for managing and revoking SSH keys [02:23:54] legoktm: But how else will we continually experience the world's worst interface if we don't use GPG? ;) [02:24:12] 🙃 [02:26:13] former WMFer Lars is working on `sq`, which is supposed to be a reasonable CLI for dealing with PGP than GPG ever was: https://sequoia-pgp.org/blog/2022/03/02/202203-sq-json-1/ [02:27:34] Indeed, and I just posted a comment in that ticket: Arch Linux is tackling a somewhat similar issue and are also using sequoia: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/archlinux-keyring [02:28:38] interesting! also, I can see the git repo, but I get a 404 on your issue link, do I need to be logged in to see it? [02:29:48] oh dangit, I didn't think about that.... Yes you do :( [02:31:51] another time then :) [02:32:38] I edited the comment to include the paragraphs of note in the ticket