[10:10:16] mutante: o/ I found out in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T230178 that siege/wrk/etc.. were removed from deploy1002. The host may not have been the right target for the packages, but those are useful in my opinion to do some benchmarks from time to time (my team used them to benchmark our k8s ml infra recently). I am wondering if we could pick up another node, maybe buildXXXX? Not sure if we have [10:10:22] security policies for those tools too. [10:11:34] (we have httpbb on deploy1002 IIRC so other tools should be ok) [10:29:06] <_joe_> elukey: something better is coming [10:29:12] <_joe_> than siege/wrk [10:29:25] <_joe_> geppetto is almost done :P [11:13:30] hi there! o/ [11:13:35] I have a couple of small Puppet changes for the beta cluster that need love and attention [11:13:42] https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/puppet/+/816140 [11:13:42] https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/puppet/+/817762 [11:14:25] anyone up to take a look when possible? [11:32:16] <_joe_> jnuche: I'll take a look after lunch [11:33:19] _joe_: thanks a lot! [13:00:39] _joe_ nice :) [13:00:48] when will it be released :) ? [13:01:19] <_joe_> elukey: ahem, the more time I can sneak into the project on the side, the sooner :D [13:02:14] ack, in the meantine anything against having siege/wrk on deploy1002? [13:02:26] <_joe_> why was wrk even removed? [13:02:27] (I'll use geppetto as beta tester if you want :) [13:02:33] <_joe_> it's a c program IIRC [13:02:47] I think it was a cleanup, https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T230178 [13:02:58] <_joe_> jnuche: I'm not sure I understand why this additional access is needed [13:03:13] <_joe_> I'll have to read the task and the patches better [13:03:23] <_joe_> but I can't just blanket-merge them in conscience [13:24:22] _joe_: the new access affects the beta cluster only [13:24:26] without it, the user used for Scap self-install (also called `scap`) cannot ssh into the target hosts [13:24:39] <_joe_> ahh ok it's for scap self-installation [13:24:40] it's the same mechanism used for the `mwdeploy` user [13:24:47] <_joe_> sorry there was a big outage ongoing [13:24:55] no worries at all [13:25:02] when you get the chance [16:47:02] elukey: I reopened the ticket that was about removing those tools, with your comment [16:47:05] Tasks created in (2022-07): 2470 [16:47:07] Tasks closed in (2022-07): 2047 [16:47:11] ^ we are not going to run out [17:01:46] howdy, i think we may need an NSCA stop/start since we are getting passive check failures for the frack hosts [17:01:54] see https://icinga.wikimedia.org/cgi-bin/icinga/status.cgi?search_string=fundraising for what we are seeing and https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T196336 for the history. [17:02:48] asked in -operations but it seems folks use that more for bot communication. [17:04:52] dwisehaupt: I will restart nsca... be right back [17:07:13] dwisehaupt: [1659373590] PASSIVE SERVICE CHECK: frdata2001;check_procs;0;PROCS OK: 279 processes [17:07:21] from the logs.. it should recover [17:08:23] yep, more and more green showing up in your link [17:09:20] mutante: awesome. thank you very much. our inboxes thank you also. :) [17:10:25] heh :) it's good that you are actually getting mails :) [18:00:48] supersonic travel is back? https://boomsupersonic.com/ looking forward to 3 hour flights from New York to Prague [18:13:39] looks expensive [18:13:58] I'm not sure what the aircraft version of vapourware is... [18:14:03] But I guess we wait and see [18:17:08] Reedy: :) well, I do see that United logo on the rendered illustration , heh [18:17:21] They've been backing it for a while [18:17:32] gotcha [18:17:45] yeah they haven't even flown their 1/3 scale prototype at all yet, let alone supersonically [18:17:56] but their marketing team is making great strides :) [18:18:28] I hope the seats in the 1/3 scale prototype are also 1/3 scale [18:19:31] fully agree, I think test pilots have it way too easy [18:19:43] just a life of unconscionable comfort and luxury [18:52:04] Hello, I hope this is the right channel to ask this question: if our team want to update our JS project's eslint parser option to use the latest ecmaVersion (13), would it cause any problems wrt maintenance? [18:56:38] maryyang: It's possibly a question better suited to #wikimedia-releng [18:56:53] gotcha! thank you! [22:05:46] Hi, I know some of you have noticed that I recently bulk closed low/est priority 'inactive' search tickets. This was an attempt to tame our backlog a bit to make our workflows more usable, but I want to own that this may be counter to how these tickets and boards have been used to track our software development and ideas and communication with our volunteers, and apologize for making a big move without understanding its full consequences [22:06:15] mpham: my link here was a typo first time. Can you post in -tech where the discussion is and I linked logs [22:06:33] oops, sure