[14:25:43] <roy649>	 I just got a "Original error: upstream connect error or disconnect/reset before headers. reset reason: overflow"
[14:25:48] <roy649>	 something going on?
[14:26:51] <roy649>	 And now:
[14:26:56] <roy649>	 Request from 2600:4041:51ec:c500:11c:89f4:5ab2:a0b0 via cp1085.eqiad.wmnet, ATS/9.1.4
[14:26:56] <roy649>	 Error: 502, Broken pipe at 2023-04-17 14:26:18 GMT
[14:28:19] <Reedy>	 SRE's are aware and dealing with it...
[14:28:27] <roy649>	 k, thanks.
[15:25:13] <sukhe>	 volans: if you are around, quick question
[15:25:19] <volans>	 sure
[15:25:27] <sukhe>	 if the first puppet run in a cookbook fails and then we do a "retry" and it works
[15:25:32] <sukhe>	 the cookbook reports a failure with:
[15:25:34] <sukhe>	 > First Puppet run failed, asking the operator what to do
[15:25:39] <sukhe>	 as the thing that failed
[15:25:50] <sukhe>	 is that intentional? or is something else wrong here that I am missing?
[15:26:07] <volans>	 let me check the logs
[15:26:22] <sukhe>	 thanks
[15:26:23] <sukhe>	 lvs1020
[15:26:29] <sukhe>	 we have seen it with other LVSes before too
[15:26:44] <sukhe>	 usually the first one we reimage in site, if we don't update the iface names quickly enough
[15:27:01] <sukhe>	 then we do them and retry and even though everything else works, it still says it failed because of this
[15:27:04] <sukhe>	 and hence the question
[15:28:09] <volans>	 ah you mean the final state of the cookbook
[15:28:18] <volans>	 but it does run fine, correct?
[15:28:19] <sukhe>	 yep 
[15:28:21] <sukhe>	 to both
[15:28:31] <volans>	 ok, might be a bug, checking
[15:28:43] <volans>	 the retry was added later
[15:28:51] <sukhe>	 ok thank you
[15:29:03] <sukhe>	 not urgent
[15:32:27] <volans>	 sukhe: confirmed, the fact that the failure was registered is what makes it say FAIL, but ofc it should not be that, as most a warning 
[15:32:59] <sukhe>	 volans: thanks for checking
[15:35:03] <sukhe>	 volans: happy to open a task or even patch
[15:58:18] <volans>	 sukhe: a task would be great, I looked at it and started to make a patch but I'd like to refactor a bit that part
[15:58:44] <sukhe>	 volans: sure, I will file one today after the SRE meeting
[15:58:57] <volans>	 thx
[17:37:26] <sukhe>	 re: above, I filed https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T334880 ["cookbooks.sre.hosts.reimage should not fail if the first Puppet run failed and if the user was prompted"]
[17:37:46] <volans>	 thanks!