[14:25:11] federico3: I have a puppet change for Remove db2133 in puppet-merge. is this fine to merge? [14:27:21] jelto: on which puppetserver? [14:27:57] puppetserver1001, because it was merged here https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/puppet/+/1113183 and needs to be merged a second time on the actual puppet server [14:28:43] a second time? Anyhow yes please, the host is decommissioned [14:28:49] jelto: Second time? [14:29:23] I have that change in puppet-merge, can I proceed? [14:30:23] yes please [14:30:39] ack, thanks I'll proceed [14:44:07] I think he meant on gerrit and with puppet-merge [14:48:35] both are merges, so it is right, but I try to use "deployed" for the second one to avoid missunderstandings [16:03:07] kamila_: shall I merge your puppet patch? 'wikikube: rename mw14[76-81] to wikikube-worker*' [16:03:23] andrewbogott: go for it, sorry [16:03:36] np done [16:38:39] slyngs: would it break something if I started editing netbox with my broken (T373702) account? [16:38:40] T373702: Unable to log in to Netbox - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T373702 [17:33:37] I'm seeing `/srv/wikimedia/conf/updates: Multiple update patterns named 'conftool'!` when trying to run reprepro checkupdate on apt1002, it does not seem to be actually getting through it [17:33:56] I see (as it says) that there's two entries in that file with the same name, should I rename one of them? [17:37:17] it was introduced here https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/puppet/+/1111945 [17:38:31] hmmm, it seems suspicious yep that those are the only ones repeated, and the rest of the entries seem to make some effort to avoid repeating (like appending `-buster/-bullseye`) [17:39:09] _joe_: ^ would be ok if I rename those entries? (append the -bookworm|-bullseye) [17:43:17] sent https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/c/operations/puppet/+/1113509 to do so :), maybe moritzm might know too? [17:46:54] <_joe_> dcaro: sigh yes [17:47:22] <_joe_> sorry about that [17:47:35] np :), thanks for the quick reply, deploying [17:51:25] <_joe_> reprepro and footguns, a marriage made in hell [17:51:53] <_joe_> I'm sorry I didn't get to test it, though [18:51:58] swfrench-wmf: A puppet spec test has bitrotted in some way such that it's now blocking unrelated changes. I'm pinging you because you touched it last, are you able to fix? https://integration.wikimedia.org/ci/job/operations-puppet-tests-bullseye/4909/console [18:52:15] If you're unfamiliar then I can also figure it out, just thought it might be trivial for you [18:53:11] hmm actually that is Traffic [18:53:16] let me fix it [18:53:19] patching [18:53:38] sorry about that -- we removed a testlb service today and I think it's the remains of that [18:54:02] ah, yeah - was just about to say, I think those are the VIPs retired earlier today [18:54:10] sukhe: thank you for doing so! [18:54:31] oh andrewbogott already has a patch [18:54:32] let me see [18:54:55] my patch is just "don't do that then" [18:55:01] there's likely a more correct fix? [18:55:12] I think so but double checking [18:55:27] thxx [18:56:04] +1 [18:56:38] ok, easy then :) [18:57:02] are new IPs about to be added which will break it again? [18:57:31] no, it should be OK now. that service no longer exists but the spec file expected it to and hence it was complaining [18:57:54] oh, great [18:57:59] the other IP in there is unlikely to change, it's the text-lb eqiad IP [19:56:12] Why, after more than a decade of technological advancement, am I still spending all day fixing partman recipes?