[09:23:55] [[Tech]]; Matěj Suchánek; undo unrelated post; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=21994685&oldid=21989648&rcid=19601432 [13:59:39] [[Tech]]; 2601:603:4E00:889:0:0:0:1002; [none]; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=21995863&oldid=21994685&rcid=19603188 [13:59:53] [[Tech]]; Tegel; Reverted changes by [[Special:Contributions/2601:603:4E00:889:0:0:0:1002|2601:603:4E00:889:0:0:0:1002]] ([[User talk:2601:603:4E00:889:0:0:0:1002|talk]]) to last version by Matěj Suchánek; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=21995865&oldid=21995863&rcid=19603193 [21:42:15] apparently every 'no such article exists' page now has a link to Santali wikipedia [21:42:23] anyone know why? [21:43:06] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_user_landing_page&page=Nonexistent+page [21:51:33] a link where? [21:51:41] https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q97272238&action=history [21:52:43] though it was the sitelink that created the wikidata item, I moved the satwiki sitelink to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q60596895 [21:54:27] (not sure how useful that satwiki page is, being in english and sitting in ns0 instead of the project namespace, but a local admin created it so they probably know what they're doing) [22:00:30] thank you [22:31:51] legoktm: how should I tell if piprop is used? [22:32:00] if it's not given, it will get the defaults [22:32:20] good question [22:32:28] maybe remove the default for it? [22:32:42] or, $this->getRequest()->getVal( 'piprop' ) maybe [22:32:51] hmm [22:32:54] yes i could remoe the default [22:33:14] because prpiprop will still get the default, and that's what matters [22:33:31] tbh, do we even need to support piprop anymore? if it's not set, the default of prpiprop is used, which covers everything [22:33:57] hmmm gooooood point [22:34:19] emitting more data rather than less is not a breaking change [22:34:35] yes, and that's already the compromise made in the patch as it is [22:35:11] I think you'll get an unrecognized parameter warning then, which is good [22:40:21] yes that works [22:40:36] you get namespaces + quality level and a warning [22:41:11] perfect [22:48:42] inductiveload: patch lgtm, but the commit message needs updating [22:49:37] don't use the word deprecation? [22:50:38] yeah and "prpiprop is provided as an alternative" - it's no longer an alternative, it's the only option now :) [22:52:05] ok hows that [22:52:44] s/legacy/legacy client/ [22:52:48] lgtm :) [22:56:31] I submitted a patch for Pywikibot too