[00:01:17] mariofinale: can you file a bug in Phabricator for it? I think it's a bug in the extension. [00:03:12] Sure [00:03:53] I guess I'll have to postpone the usage of that extension for the moment [00:13:36] Done: T292932 [00:13:37] T292932: urlshortener-blocked on bot account with global-ipblock-exempt - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T292932 [00:13:53] Thanks for your help [06:20:46] hi, could I ask if there is the recommendation of gerrit extension for VSCode? [10:25:38] can an admin protect this page Meta:Example I just removed spam on it and the banner on all wikipedia (for the new Movement Charter) is currently linking to it [10:26:32] nobody but a member of the technical team should be able to edit Meta:Example anyway [10:27:15] on which wiki? [10:27:25] meta [10:27:32] why doe we have a banner pointing to it anyways? [10:27:33] meta.wikimedia.org [10:27:40] so, https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Sandbox ? [10:27:55] protecting a sandbox doesn’t sound to me like it makes much sense tbh [10:27:56] this https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Example [10:28:00] Lucas_WMDE: no https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Example [10:28:10] https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:CentralNotice&subaction=noticeDetail¬ice=Movement+Charter+Drafting+Committee+Election indeed links to Meta:Example [10:28:11] I think that banner is broken [10:28:12] ah, ok [10:28:13] any cn admins around? [10:28:26] yes the banner is broken and that's not the first time btw [10:28:35] urbanecm: ^ [10:28:44] Guest30: they should be tested [10:28:45] what's up? [10:28:59] oh [10:29:01] urbanecm: there's a CN banner linking to Meta:Example [10:29:06] disabling [10:29:38] done [10:29:39] (I got confused by https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Example, sorry) [10:30:01] also some garbage is still on the page [10:30:33] reverted [10:30:56] lemme also find DerHexer somewhere and get them to fix it [10:31:06] Guest30: cleaned up [10:31:23] I guess I edit conflicted [10:32:19] nobody should be able to edit Meta:Example except the technical team anyway [10:32:46] Looks like MA removed it [10:33:12] It's not had any trouble in 3 years before today [10:33:55] did they fix the banner? [10:34:20] No we just disabled it [10:34:56] Martin is currently looking for DerHexer who created it to fix it [10:35:12] banner is live again, fixed now (hopefully) [10:35:40] Guest30: ^ [10:36:17] https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Centralnotice-template-mc_dc_election&diff=22164300&oldid=22149962, looks good to me [10:36:37] i also temporarily fully protected the example page, basically to stop users "fixing" it by redirecting [10:36:53] urbanecm: that gives "This election has finished, you can no longer vote." for me [10:36:59] grr [10:37:26] plus the link should probably be to the local wiki instead of meta, if it's a fancy election with cross-wiki eligibility on securepoll [10:37:44] yeah it's still broken [10:37:47] campaign disabled again [10:39:35] at meta, the correct link apparently is https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:SecurePoll/vote/390 [10:39:49] but at dewiki, de.wikipedia.org/wiki/special:Securepoll/vote/377 works [10:39:54] don't ask me why, please :D [10:40:25] why? [10:40:35] i have no idea [10:40:56] I thought securepoll was supposed to use the same id globally [10:41:13] apparently it's https://vote.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:SecurePoll/list/1208 on votewiki [10:41:59] interesting [10:43:19] apparently board election used /wiki/Special:SecurePoll/vote/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_Elections_2021 [10:43:30] anyway, I'll let DerHexer & WMF to figure it out [21:16:35] urbanecm, majavah: Tim Starling did a lot of work on securepoll recently. Maybe talk to him? [21:17:03] duesen: it looks we were just using a wrong format of link. Figured it out in the meanwhile. But thanks! [21:17:24] ok, cheers!