[08:20:20] What's the setting to turn off JavaScript validation for user scripts? I tried $wgResourceLoaderValidateJS = false;, doesn't look like it worked. [08:27:27] [[Tech]]; 178.133.30.42; /* або */ new section; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=23956521&oldid=23955407&rcid=25268430 [08:27:58] [[Tech]]; Novem Linguae; Undo revision 23956521 by [[Special:Contributions/178.133.30.42|178.133.30.42]] ([[User talk:178.133.30.42|talk]]) - rvv; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=23956523&oldid=23956521&rcid=25268432 [14:22:16] [[Tech]]; AKlapper (WMF); [none]; https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=23957230&oldid=23956523&rcid=25269938 [14:37:24] about the problem i reported yesterday (unable to create pages on en.wiktionary.org): apparently it was because i was still connected to a hybrid VPN, and had forgotten. i don't know why that caused the issue but it did. [16:03:11] How do you get the gate and submit task to re-run after a flaky test from another extension caused a failure? [16:08:28] send another comment with a CR+2 vote [16:08:38] if you gave the original +2, send any comment and don’t change your vote [16:09:00] if someone else gave the original +2, you’ll have to vote +2 as well, Zuul won’t look at other people’s existing votes when it decides what to do about your comment [16:12:53] I was the author of the patch, so would it be okay to +2? [16:14:02] Dreamy_Jazz: it might also work to literally comment the word "recheck" on the change [16:14:14] Thanks. Trying that now. [16:14:21] Yeah, when CI failed for unrelated reasons, it's perfectly fine to +2 your own patch again [16:14:26] The audit trail is there [16:15:43] Yeah, it looks like a dodgy selenium test in VisualEditor. [16:21:11] (recheck only repeats test builds, not gate-and-submit, afaik) [16:21:23] and I agree that a self-+2 would be acceptable [16:22:27] Thanks. I'll do a self +2 once the last recheck I did finishes. [16:23:57] yeah. as long as there's a +2er explixitely approving the patch, it doesn't really matter who does the final +2. similar logic also applies self-merging backports or patches that need to wait until a train cut [16:30:58] Nice. Thanks. I did the +2 and it's now re-running the gate and submit. Thanks.