[17:04:24] <bawolff>	 Dreamy_Jazz: I don't know why you deleted your comment, because you are 100% right :)
[17:04:51] <Dreamy_Jazz>	 I was thinking that parse would work fine?
[17:05:01] <Dreamy_Jazz>	 But I hadn't tried it.
[17:05:30] <bawolff>	 probably, but you're right about the first part of my comment being a bad idea in context
[17:05:44] <Dreamy_Jazz>	 Okay. I don't think I can undelete that comment though.
[17:06:37] <Dreamy_Jazz>	 I'll experiment and see if ::parse removes bdi tags.
[17:07:27] <bawolff>	 I guess in theory ->parse can affect other things if something else in the message looks like wikitext
[17:08:19] <Dreamy_Jazz>	 That should be fine as none of those messages should have anything like that.
[17:08:20] <bawolff>	 The main thing I'm curious about is why phan-taint-check didn't catch this issue. This is the most clear example I've found so far of the recent things that seem like something it could of caught
[17:08:27] <Dreamy_Jazz>	 Yeah...
[17:08:58] <Dreamy_Jazz>	 ::parse doesn't remove the <bdi> tag and otherwise doesn't seem to mess with anything.