[05:52:28] <NovemLinguae>	 Hey, question. How do code reviews for the operations/mediawiki-config repo work? Do I need to get a +1 first, then schedule it for a backport window? Who exactly can +1 it? Only an operations person, or any mediawiki +2er, or... ?
[07:38:23] <Bsadowski1>	 Yay, I did the account merge with my SUL account. Finally they're doing that haha
[09:35:07] <taavi>	 NovemLinguae: not required, but strongly encouraged for any non-trivial patches. the deployer can veto any patch they're not comfortable with, and reviews from people familiar with the area can greatly increase comfort level
[09:38:48] <NovemLinguae>	 👍
[09:40:04] <taavi>	 NovemLinguae: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T344409 for a bit more context last time that guidance was discussed
[09:45:18] <NovemLinguae>	 do operations/mediawiki-config changes always go via a backport window? https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_site_requests#Lifecycle_of_a_request says something about "usually within 1 week" which makes it sound like there may be a process besides the backport window
[09:47:12] <taavi>	 NovemLinguae: deployers sometimes deploy their changes out-of-window when there is nothing else happening, but otherwise yes
[10:20:41] <NovemLinguae>	 👍
[10:46:58] <_Gerges>	 Hi, I believe the `editcontentmodel` permission should be assigned to the `interface-admin` user group because they possess deep technical knowledge and expertise to avoid any errors that might affect the entire site. On the other hand, the `sysop` group is primarily focused on content management and enforcing community policies, but it does not necessarily require advanced technical expertise.
[11:10:21] <Lucas_WMDE>	 _Gerges: I don’t disagree, see also https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T320752