[05:40:56] <jinxer-wm>	 (VarnishTrafficDrop) firing: 69% GET drop in text@codfw during the past 30 minutes - https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Monitoring/VarnishTrafficDrop - https://grafana.wikimedia.org/d/000000541/varnish-caching-last-week-comparison?viewPanel=5&var-cluster=text&var-site=codfw - https://alerts.wikimedia.org
[06:05:56] <jinxer-wm>	 (VarnishTrafficDrop) resolved: 69% GET drop in text@codfw during the past 30 minutes - https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Monitoring/VarnishTrafficDrop - https://grafana.wikimedia.org/d/000000541/varnish-caching-last-week-comparison?viewPanel=5&var-cluster=text&var-site=codfw - https://alerts.wikimedia.org
[08:00:46] <wikibugs>	 10netops, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, 10netbox: ImportPuppetDB virtual chassis detection bug - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T293330 (10ayounsi)
[08:19:16] <wikibugs>	 10netops, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, 10netbox: ImportPuppetDB virtual chassis detection bug - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T293330 (10cmooney) Suggestion makes sense, using the rack names in the devices also keeps a consistent standard across sites.  So yeah +1 from me, if this simple fix sorts the p...
[08:23:36] <wikibugs>	 10netops, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, 10netbox: ImportPuppetDB virtual chassis detection bug - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T293330 (10ayounsi) 05Open→03Resolved a:03ayounsi Done and confirmed that it solves the issue.
[10:07:39] <question_mark>	 I wrote a draft of the ERC form questions in the ERC meeting document for the team, please review and provide feedback ASAP :)
[10:33:55] <wikibugs>	 10Traffic, 10netops, 10DNS, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, and 2 others: setup drmrs mgmt & private prefixs - question on switch status - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T293294 (10cmooney) > I'm thinking 10.136.0.0/16 for the site seems logical, with 10.136.128.0/17 for mgmt. Keep Vlan 900 for that also...
[12:17:56] <wikibugs>	 10Traffic, 10netops, 10DNS, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, and 2 others: setup drmrs mgmt & private prefixs - question on switch status - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T293294 (10MMandere) Thank you  @cmooney  for the inclusion.  The assignments are fine by me. I will, however, need to further consult w...
[12:20:50] <question_mark>	 topranks: I just noticed the ip assignment tickets - is it helpful if I send over a PDF with a plan on which the original assignments were based, over 6 years ago? I'm sure all that has been diluted by more recent assignments which were not aware of it, so not sure how valuable it is nowadays
[12:21:16] <topranks>	 question_mark: yeah please do if you have it
[12:22:20] <XioNoX>	 indeed, that would be interesting
[12:22:21] <question_mark>	 "plan" is overstating it really, it was an outline with ip blocks for my own overview which had a little bit of an idea behind it at the time ;p
[12:23:26] <XioNoX>	 I don't think we were aware of it when we did the eqsin allocation :)
[12:23:51] <question_mark>	 yeah
[12:23:53] <question_mark>	 sorry :/
[12:24:17] <question_mark>	 I think I last used this when assigning codfw's space
[12:24:36] <question_mark>	 sent an email
[12:24:53] <question_mark>	 it's just an outline of blocks without description, but there was a bit of a pattern to it originally ;)
[12:25:05] <question_mark>	 each site was a /12
[12:25:16] <question_mark>	 that by itself may no longer be the best idea nowadays
[12:25:42] <question_mark>	 and then production was the first /16, management the next /16
[12:26:02] <question_mark>	 etc
[12:26:12] <question_mark>	 this was partly based on existing practices that preceded this plan again, etc
[12:26:19] <question_mark>	 anyway, probably not terribly useful nowadays :(
[12:28:19] <XioNoX>	 good for historical reasons :)
[12:28:56] <topranks>	 yeah definitely good to understand the logic of what happened before, even if we choose to go a different direction
[12:29:01] <topranks>	 thanks
[12:29:09] <question_mark>	 yup
[12:30:24] <wikibugs>	 10Traffic, 10netops, 10DNS, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, and 2 others: setup drmrs mgmt & private prefixs - question on switch status - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T293294 (10BBlack) >>! In T293294#7427708, @cmooney wrote: > We've two private subnets assigned, one for each rack/switch: >  > https://...
[14:19:07] <wikibugs>	 10Traffic, 10netops, 10DNS, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, and 2 others: setup drmrs mgmt & private prefixs - question on switch status - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T293294 (10ayounsi) I created a bunch of mgmt related cables: https://netbox.wikimedia.org/dcim/cables/?q=&site=drmrs&type=&status=&colo...
[15:12:36] <wikibugs>	 10Traffic, 10netops, 10DNS, 10Infrastructure-Foundations, and 2 others: setup drmrs mgmt & private prefixs - question on switch status - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T293294 (10ayounsi) 05Open→03Resolved v6 assigned as well, server's network provisioning tested with both public/private vlan as dry...