[00:05:06] Newsletter #44: On morphological paradigms in Wikifunctions https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia/Updates/2021-09-10 [08:36:47] hi nicolas! [08:36:49] Nicolas VIGNERON, [11.09.21 10:32] [08:36:50] so... I tried to create my first function: https://notwikilambda.toolforge.org/wiki/Z10148 [08:36:52] Nicolas VIGNERON, [11.09.21 10:32] [08:36:53] and I created an implementation and a tester (https://notwikilambda.toolforge.org/wiki/Z10150) but for some reason they don't show on the function [08:36:55] did I do something wrong? [08:36:56] Nicolas VIGNERON, [11.09.21 10:33] [08:36:58] ping @lucaswerkmeister @vrandecic [08:37:03] hi Nikki (and yes, I was away for a long time, sorry :P ) [08:39:23] Nicolas welcome 😃 [09:25:15] you probably need to edit the function to add the implementation and tester [09:35:24] where/how do I do that ? (I already used the "Create a new implementation" link and I assumed - wrongly ? - the newly created implementation would be automatically display on the function...) (re @lucaswerkmeister: you probably need to edit the function to add the implementation and tester) [09:35:49] start editing the function and then you should be able to add elements to the implementation/tester lists [09:36:36] ah yes, found it (it's not automatic, my bad), thanks! (re @lucaswerkmeister: start editing the function and then you should be able to add elements to the implementation/tester lists) [09:38:41] @Nicolas I was in your shoe a couple of days before [09:39:03] and now I see that my tester fails for some reason (I'm so happy to this error :D now I can investigate) [09:40:16] and I found the (stupid) mistake, yeah, very good morning for me! [09:40:19] you’re ahead of me, by the way, so far I’ve only manually created an implementation but didn’t figure out the tester :D [09:40:24] (and couldn’t be bothered to look very far into it) [09:40:44] I haven't even tried making anything 😔 [09:41:10] hey, I was away from internet for a month, now I have to catch up, I'm excited to try new things :P [09:41:57] and I mostly copied the example in English, it was not very complicated ;) [09:42:02] ❤️❤️❤️ (re @Nicolas: hey, I was away from internet for a month, now I have to catch up, I'm excited to try new things :P) [09:57:28] testers seems pretty straight forward : you give the input, the function and the expected output (re @lucaswerkmeister: you’re ahead of me, by the way, so far I’ve only manually created an implementation but didn’t figure out the tester :D) [12:56:22] how did you survive that? (re @Nicolas: hey, I was away from internet for a month, now I have to catch up, I'm excited to try new things :P) [12:59:01] https://notwikilambda.toolforge.org/wiki/Z10148 looks very good! I feel like creating some myself for Danish now that you broke the ice 😃 [13:02:36] I will create several clinical and biomedical functions. (re @DennisPriskorn: https://notwikilambda.toolforge.org/wiki/Z10148 looks very good! I feel like creating some myself for Danish now that you broke the ice 😃) [13:02:42] This will be interesting [13:05:50] we kind of need math operators though [13:06:37] Was it not so that all the content of this wiki could be lost at any time? So save the information locally also? [13:12:28] This fails the tests... https://notwikilambda.toolforge.org/wiki/Z10103 [13:12:35] no idea why [13:13:22] oh, here one of them passes https://notwikilambda.toolforge.org/wiki/Z10104 [13:29:22] I'm super giddy to see all the excitement here! And thanks for the feedback, we're seeing it and plan on improving the UX considerably, to make the necessary steps easier to discover [13:29:50] Particularly the "oh the implementation and the tester are not connected to the function yet" part [13:30:24] Regarding the tests, there are currently a lot of false negatives regarding falling tests [13:32:25] So if you click on the failing test and see something saying "expected I, received n", that's almost always a bug on our side. We're working on it. [13:36:05] 👌 (re @vrandecic: So if you click on the failing test and see something saying "expected I, received n", that's almost always a bug on our side. We're working on it.) [13:39:25] Nicolas your implementation of the french plural is great! Just one thing: your return is based on Z10132K1 a few times, but that should be Z10148K1 (copy and paste issue). So that part won't work. That's something we should improve. [13:39:25] But that's pretty awesome! Thank you for using Lucas' installation!