[00:09:53] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> A function call that produces a type
[00:10:22] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> There's a small difference between a reference to a function, and a function call to a function (using that reference)
[00:10:44] <vrandecic>	 Newsletter 60: How do we represent functions? https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia/Updates/2022-01-28
[00:13:35] <wm-bb>	 <lucaswerkmeister> got it
[17:34:39] <wm-bb>	 <lucaswerkmeister> the Return type section has “For the two “divide” functions mentioned above”, but the two divide functions are actually below – should the sentence be changed to “below”, or are Return type and List of arguments in the wrong order? (re @wmtelegram_bot: <vrandecic> Newsletter 60: How do we represent functions? https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia/Updates/2022-01-28)
[17:55:11] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> Ah, my mistake. I wanted return type before list of arguments because it explains type. It should be changed to "below", thanks for catching it!
[17:57:30] <wm-bb>	 <lucaswerkmeister> alright, changed :)