[00:07:06] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> Wikifunctions will certainly be able to take that data and turn it into tables. Funny thing you're talking about elections, by the way, as I was just chatting this week to Felix Sargent, who was also interested in elections and data - he was talking about it on the main Wikidata channel. Maybe the two of you should connect? (re @AracasDragon: I was wondering how much wikifunction <clipped message>
[00:07:07] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> s Abstract Wikipedia would work with data
[00:07:09] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> 
[00:07:10] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> For example, I work a lot on articles for electi...)
[10:16:22] <wm-bb>	 <relgu> Well, it's impressive NLG but there is just one tiny little problem... It seems none of the articles this model generates are factual. (re @Csisc1994: For example, this is what I had for @vrandecic: https://galactica.org/?prompt=Wikipedia+article+on+Denny+Vrandecic is the link.)
[14:52:30] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> Ah, details... :D
[22:46:37] <vrandecic>	 Newsletter #94: Code of Conduct for Wikifunctions - https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia/Updates/2022-11-17
[22:47:08] <vrandecic>	 Your input would be very much appreciated! As I write there, a strong showing indicates a strong commitment.