[01:52:40] <wm-bb>	 <nlikomitros> 3 4 5 7
[13:45:55] <wm-bb>	 <Sannita> Function calling is now fixed! Please let us know if it works for you
[14:04:51] <wm-bb>	 <Terasail> Looks to be working for me
[14:07:00] <wm-bb>	 <Ege> Works for me too
[14:52:39] <taavi>	 what does "[Z525/Invalid key] No argument called Z10846K1 in scope" mean? seeing that when trying to run tests on https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z10856
[16:25:39] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> That's an implementation of the function Z10627 which has one argument Z10627K1 but instead we're calling the argument Z10846K1 from the function Z10846 which is out of scope for the given implementation
[16:27:32] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> With T336985 this error should become a thing of the past, that's really not a great UX right now
[16:35:31] <taavi>	 good catch, thanks. and the (admittedly very silly) implementation works now
[16:37:28] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> I like these kinds of implementations. Particularly compositions can sometimes be more like specifications. The system should take care not to actually use this implementation, but it may help a human visiting Wikifunctions and understanding this particular function.
[18:17:32] <wm-bb>	 <lucaswerkmeister> noob question: can functions produce errors? e.g. something like an `InvalidArgumentException` in other languages
[19:19:56] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> Yes! I'm not 100% sure it all works right now, and it certainly needs documentation, but it should be possible. I'm going to check that today or tomorrow.
[21:40:26] <wm-bb>	 <lucaswerkmeister> okay, thanks! I was wondering what Z10866 should do if _full string_ doesn’t start with _search substring_
[21:40:58] <wm-bb>	 <lucaswerkmeister> (but SPARQL just returns the empty string in that case, so I think that would also be an okay solution without needing an error)
[21:41:30] <wm-bb>	 <lucaswerkmeister> anyway – anyone want to take a look at that function and figure out what I did wrong with the test? the validator error summary is “[Z539/wrong content type]” and I can’t figure out why
[21:41:56] <wm-bb>	 <mahir256> . (re @mahir256: if you're working on manipulating/returning Qids as strings, be mindful of phabricator.wikimedia.org/T343593#9074979 (which is a...)
[21:42:21] <wm-bb>	 <lucaswerkmeister> lisa_simpson_stare.jpg
[21:42:33] <wm-bb>	 <lucaswerkmeister> ok then I guess I’ll use a less clever test case
[21:42:34] <wm-bb>	 <lucaswerkmeister> thanks :D
[21:46:34] <wm-bb>	 <lucaswerkmeister> yay now it’s working