[07:02:41] <wm-bb>	 <dpriskorn> tried adding a test here for hund->hundarhttps://wikifunctions.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Special:ViewObject/en/Z10297 : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/a673c231/file_52318.jpg
[07:03:06] <wm-bb>	 <dpriskorn> @Jan_ainali how did you get permission?
[07:04:23] <wm-bb>	 <dpriskorn> This is wrong BTW @ainali : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/bff57b68/file_52319.jpg
[07:05:55] <wm-bb>	 <dpriskorn> Here is the cause but I cant edit it to improve it : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/e8eb2b03/file_52320.jpg
[07:09:01] <wm-bb>	 <Nikki> what's wrong about it?
[07:09:55] <wm-bb>	 <Nikki> the output matches what https://svenska.se/saol/?id=1150238 says
[07:15:55] <wm-bb>	 <dpriskorn> ah, you are indeed correct. I was thinking it generated plural 😅 (re @Nikki: the output matches what https://svenska.se/saol/?id=1150238 says)
[07:16:24] <wm-bb>	 <dpriskorn> Here is a real bug then 😉https://wikifunctions.beta.wmflabs.org/view/en/Z10241 : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/57356b21/file_52321.jpg
[07:18:40] <wm-bb>	 <dpriskorn> Also @vrandecic I unfortunately don't understand how to use this checker.Would it be possible to demo it in a video or a series of images in the repo with clarifications for each step? : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/894fa84a/file_52322.jpg
[07:21:22] <wm-bb>	 <Nikki> I'm pretty sure there was a demo video when it was first announced
[07:34:55] <wm-bb>	 <Nikki> given that "mice" is an irregular plural, I wouldn't expect that to work without checking lexemes, and it's not wrong, it's a possible plural for the sense meaning an input device for a computer (re @dpriskorn: Here is a real bug then 😉
[07:34:56] <wm-bb>	 <Nikki> https://wikifunctions.beta.wmflabs.org/view/en/Z10241)
[08:23:17] <wm-bb>	 <dpriskorn> nice, do you have a link to it? (re @Nikki: I'm pretty sure there was a demo video when it was first announced)
[08:25:09] <wm-bb>	 <dpriskorn> indeed, that was new to me. : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/cfbefe88/file_52324.jpg
[08:26:42] <wm-bb>	 <dpriskorn> in that case I guess computer mouse should be a separate lexeme from the animal mouse? It isnt currently, see L1119
[08:32:55] <wm-bb>	 <Sannita> It should, I think (re @dpriskorn: in that case I guess computer mouse should be a separate lexeme from the animal mouse? It isnt currently, see L1119)
[08:33:20] <wm-bb>	 <dpriskorn> lexeme conflation?
[08:34:12] <wm-bb>	 <dpriskorn> we need a good tool for this. currently the duplicate user script does not support lexemes...
[09:04:22] <wm-bb>	 <Ege> I think that a computer mouse is actually a sense of the mouse mouse. It's not a homograph that exists due to luck, it's derived from the same word. For the plural (I think for the computer kind it's mouses?) maybe that could be specified somehow in the forms?
[09:04:23] <wm-bb>	 <Ege> 
[09:04:25] <wm-bb>	 <Ege> I don't really know how to separate senses and separate lexemes according to any rules though. I generally tend to do it as the Turkish Dictionary I use does.
[09:04:26] <wm-bb>	 <Ege> 
[09:04:28] <wm-bb>	 <Ege> (Not sure if it matters, but for "fare" which is mouse in Turkish, it gives the two meanings as senses and not as separate articles)
[09:10:06] <wm-bb>	 <dpriskorn> We have discussed this a while back in the lexeme chat but I honestly don't remember the outcome.
[09:10:36] <wm-bb>	 <cvictororovich> PLEASE!
[09:10:49] <wm-bb>	 <cvictororovich> Someone should be blocked promptly!
[09:14:35] <wm-bb>	 <cvictororovich> [[WF:Report vandalism]]
[09:14:53] <wm-bb>	 <cvictororovich> I reported there
[09:15:26] <wm-bb>	 <Sannita> An admin will take care of it as soon as possible
[09:15:38] <wm-bb>	 <cvictororovich> Nobody is responding
[09:15:55] <wm-bb>	 <Sannita> I can't do anything, I'm currently boarding a plane
[09:18:13] <wm-bb>	 <Terasail> They have been blocked
[09:18:58] <wm-bb>	 <Sannita> Thanks (re @Terasail: They have been blocked)
[09:22:15] <wm-bb>	 <Ameisenigel> Blocked this one and their other account as well
[09:23:26] <wm-bb>	 <Terasail> Can you block their other 2 3 accounts without contribs aswell?
[09:26:54] <wm-bb>	 <Ameisenigel> Done
[09:27:09] <wm-bb>	 <cvictororovich> Thank you very much (re @Ameisenigel: Done)
[09:27:38] <wm-bb>	 <cvictororovich> The first ever block here
[09:28:50] <wm-bb>	 <cvictororovich> How did you know other 3 accounts belong to the same person? (re @Ameisenigel: Blocked this one and their other account as well)
[09:29:17] <wm-bb>	 <Terasail> Well if you check recent changes
[09:30:21] <wm-bb>	 <Terasail> They have the same name and 2 of the account were actually created by one of the vandal accounts and it all happened within ~10 mins of each other before they started to vandalise
[09:34:43] <wm-bb>	 <Ameisenigel> Yes. I also know this vandal from Wikitech wiki. They can be identified by their user name and behaviour.
[09:36:23] <wm-bb>	 <cvictororovich> Are you that omb from Deutschland? (re @Ameisenigel: Yes. I also know this vandal from Wikitech wiki. They can be identified by their user name and behaviour.)
[09:37:36] <wm-bb>	 <Ameisenigel> Yes
[09:39:34] <wm-bb>	 <cvictororovich> (Did you involve in development of MW extensions
[09:40:13] <wm-bb>	 <Ameisenigel> No, I am not a developer
[09:40:24] <wm-bb>	 <cvictororovich> Many thanks anyways