[00:00:21] https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z11?action=edit&uselang=en : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/a099065e/file_52680.jpg [00:00:21] How can I add my language to this list? [00:00:42] I had deleted the previous message, but I was wrong. [00:02:38] press the "+", find your language, add your label, then press "Publish" at the bottom (re @caiohm: How can I add my language to this list?) [00:03:15] He says I don't have permission to do that. 🙁 (re @mahir256: press the "+", find your language, add your label, then press "Publish" at the bottom) [02:57:12] You need the functioneer right to do so [02:58:39] See [[Wikifunctions:Apply for editing]] [20:52:48] In some ways, composition is that abstract programming language (re @waldyrious: Maybe there could be an Abstract Wikifunctions that could render an algorithm in various (programming) languages, including pseu...) [20:55:55] Then I suppose we'd need a way to visualize composite functions that reads more like a code file than a tree of nodes and attributes? Sounds intriguing. (re @vrandecic: In some ways, composition is that abstract programming language) [20:58:14] (although the tree view is arguably valuable as well for understanding, as the existence of Scratch and similar visual programming platforms probably suggests) [20:58:40] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Checking_forms.webm (re @dpriskorn: Also @vrandecic I unfortunately don't understand how to use this checker. [20:58:41] Would it be possible to demo it in a video or a series...) [21:00:20] I agree, I'm sure there are many fun ways to visualize compositions. When you collapse them, they already look very different than the node tree view. Very curious to see things happen here! (re @waldyrious: Then I suppose we'd need a way to visualize composite functions that reads more like a code file than a tree of nodes and attrib...) [21:11:11] Nicolas was mostly right. It's not possible now. It won't happen in the next month or two. And I wish it will eventually happen, but we will see how stable such a solution would be. We might need to do something else. I hope not. (re @harej: 1. Does Wikifunctions have access to the Wikidata Query Service? 2. Will it ever? 3. As a workaround, could a process query the ...) [21:12:26] I hope it will be somewhen possible to write function compositions in Wikifunctions in a similar way like Spreadsheet functions. [21:13:24] Neat idea to extend this to whole JSON objects or Wikidata items! I haven't thought that far. We will clearly need that functionality, agreed. I thought functions would be good for that. I think parsers and renderers are more relevant for human consumption. But hey, it wouldn't be the first time I get surprised. (re @harej: This is great because I was thinking about how this prob [21:13:24] lem would work yesterday. I like where this is going. What would be the ...) [21:13:41] Agreed (re @Hogü-456: I hope it will be somewhen possible to write function compositions in Wikifunctions in a similar way like Spreadsheet functions.)