[12:17:18] 2969 [12:17:25] Greetings, esteemed individuals! [12:17:26] I am currently seeking exceptional paintings for purchase. If you possess a remarkable piece of art that you believe would be a fitting addition, please do not hesitate to contact me. Your interest and participation would be greatly appreciated. [15:08:06] I just created a few conjugation functions for Breton: https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Catalogue#For_Breton_verbs [15:08:31] it's a bit mind-numbing so I'll take a break for today, if you have any remarks or comments, feel free to share them ;) [15:11:15] by the way, do we have some sort of taggin for functions (like category or keyword), it would be interresting to easily get all functions related to Breton or to conjugation (I *think* I'm the only one doing function for Breton, and I *think* it is the first functions for conjugation but I don't know any way to check if it really is) [15:13:45] Don't think there is anything at the moment, the closest you might get is creating a page Wikifunctions:Brenton_functions or something along those lines. [15:14:21] if only someone had created a way to have structured data for mediawiki pages... :P [15:17:04] I have a few Punjabi and Hindustani conjugation functions linked on the catalogue so far (re @Nicolas: by the way, do we have some sort of taggin for functions (like category or keyword), it would be interresting to easily get all ...) [15:47:17] ah yes, sorry I missed them (re @bgo_eiu: I have a few Punjabi and Hindustani conjugation functions linked on the catalogue so far) [15:48:02] true, but to be honest a wikibase inside wikifunctions might be a bit overkill :D (re @Nikki: if only someone had created a way to have structured data for mediawiki pages... :P) [15:48:47] I was thinking more like commons, where files have structured data using wikidata items [16:08:49] Are composition implementations expected to be slower than Python or JavaScript ones? [16:26:01] We probably could use categories on the talk page. Not a long term solution, but to understand how that might be used (re @Nicolas: by the way, do we have some sort of taggin for functions (like category or keyword), it would be interresting to easily get all ...) [16:27:25] It depends on the algorithm. My intuitions about this have been surprisingly often wrong. Try it out! (re @bgo_eiu: Are composition implementations expected to be slower than Python or JavaScript ones?) [16:28:48] My intuition was indeed that native implementations are faster than compositions, but as said, I've been wrong a few times. [16:35:18] Commons does have a Wikibase 😉 (re @Nikki: I was thinking more like commons, where files have structured data using wikidata items) [16:36:23] it doesn't have its own items and properties though [16:49:14] wikifunctions having a completely independent wikibase with its own set of items and properties and links between the items does seem like it would be overkill, but existing pages having an integrated structured data section using existing items and properties (like it's implemented on commons) seems like a reasonable approach for things like this where some structured data would [16:49:14] be useful, but you don't need to create a whole separate ontology [16:49:42] I doubt the commons stuff was implemented in a way that's easy to reuse for things other than files though [16:51:46] entity schemas and maps/tabular data in the data namespace on commons are other places where some structured data would be nice