[01:57:35] <wm-bb>	 <Toby> Yes, each element a list of code-point (sub-elements). I tried element equality = list equality (that was my first expectation), but it didn't work. I've now switched to object equality, which I can live with and seems to work for now. (re @Al: Are they, though? It looks like the first element is actually a list (of code-point elements). So I guess you would need list eq...)
[15:57:18] <wm-bb>	 <Al> Z13269 (re @Nikki: -en comes to mind (redden), I thought of -ise and -ology too but haven't thought of any words ending with a short vowel and cons...)
[20:46:47] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> I'm not particularly in favor of having more built-in functions, I think we already have too many. I'm also not in favor of an object identity function, because I don't think it makes sense. But there's already a task for the latter, where we can discuss this. And you can file a task for the former. (re @Toby: @vrandecic This reminds me. Is this an appropriate place to suggest a  <clipped message>
[20:46:47] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> few built-in functions? Z13052 and Z13036 are both hacks b...)