[18:31:13] Hallo [18:31:33] The documentation for the message wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-implementation-type says: [18:31:40] "A label in the function call metadata dialog. Refers to the type of the implementation (Built-In, Evaluated, Composition) used to run the function." [18:32:18] Does this mean that the value can be "Built-In", "Evaluated", "Composition"? [18:32:33] And if yes, are these actual messages that can be translated somewhere? [18:46:58] Hi, have you asked at https://t.me/abstract_wikipedia_tech? My *guess* is that “Evaluated” refers to implementations that are written in code, but it doesn’t seem like the correct word in that case. 🤷‍♂️ [19:15:55] The values appear as Implementation Type if you look at “Details” of an evaluation. The label (“Implementation Type”) appears in different languages, but the associated value appears to be a literal string (with “BuiltIn” in the case of a built-in function). (re @amire80: And if yes, are these actual messages that can be translated somewhere?) [19:20:50] A French example: the second bullet point. : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/399542da/file_57773.jpg [20:59:20] This seems suboptimal. It should be translatable. [20:59:24] Thanks for the example. [21:19:11] It is not consistent with the term used on an implementation page, where the alternative to “composition” (in English) is either “code” or “*This is a built-in implementation within the core software and is not visible here.”* (re @amire80: This seems suboptimal. It should be translatable.)