[11:42:14] Hi all! Our next *Volunteers' Corner* will be held on March 4, at 18:30 UTC (https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1709577000). [11:42:15] [11:42:16] If you have questions or ideas to discuss, or you want to get in touch with the dev team, please join us! The link to the meeting is https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw [11:42:18] [11:42:19] Hope to see you there! [11:42:21] (re @Sannita: Hi all! Our next Volunteers' Corner will be held on March 4, at 18:30 UTC. [11:42:22] [11:42:24] If you have questions or ideas to discuss, or you wa...) [21:20:09] The page https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:About says "A Wikimedia project for everyone to collaboratively create and maintain a library of code functions to support the Wikimedia projects and beyond, for everyone to call and re-use in the world's natural and programming languages" [21:20:10] [21:20:12] Some other project description pages say similar things. [21:20:27] What does "natural languages" refer to exactly? The implementations are written in programming languages. [21:22:03] The two places I can think of where natural languages are present are label translations for function names, inputs, etc., and the _output_ of functions that create text. Is there anything else? [21:31:44] I guess some functions will be used to generate wikipedia articles at some point, aka abstract wikipedia [21:34:59] in theory [21:36:27] Yes, that's exactly what I mean by "output of functions that create text". (re @Emilio: I guess some functions will be used to generate wikipedia articles at some point, aka abstract wikipedia) [22:06:18] If the objects are labelled in your language, you can “program” using compositions of those objects, rather than directly in code… but it’s early days. (re @amire80: The two places I can think of where natural languages are present are label translations for function names, inputs, etc., and t...) [22:31:24] There's another thing I wanted to ask on the "About" page... but I preferred to write it on the talk page: https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions_talk:About [22:40:54] And the input. Especially in the tests, so that our functions are robustly tested in all scripts. (re @amire80: The two places I can think of where natural languages are present are label translations for function names, inputs, etc., and t...) [23:12:18] "input" as in "names of parameters" or as in "content of arguments"? (re @Toby: And the input. Especially in the tests, so that our functions are robustly tested in all scripts.) [23:12:46] (If I understand correctly, WF calls parameters "inputs", but maybe I'm wrong.) [23:22:26] Both accept all languages. It looked like you were missing the latter. (re @amire80: "input" as in "names of parameters" or as in "content of arguments"?)