[06:38:59] <wm-bb>	 <Al> Yes, re-entrancy is the correct theoretical solution, but I imagine function libraries could serve as a form of persistent cache for improved performance. (re @vrandecic: It is an idea. Re-entrancy could solve most of the need for this I think, and then, well, making it more performant.)
[12:47:24] <wm-bb>	 <Matt> 682
[12:47:41] <wm-bb>	 <Sannita> write 7682
[12:47:56] <wm-bb>	 <Matt> 7862
[12:48:10] <wm-bb>	 <Sannita> nope, 7682
[12:48:25] <wm-bb>	 <Matt> 7682
[12:48:40] <wm-bb>	 <Sannita> welcome Matt :)
[12:49:00] <wm-bb>	 <Matt> Thank you
[18:44:39] <wm-bb>	 <Марк> 3382
[19:10:28] <wm-bb>	 <Марк> Hello. Why do we need Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia if there is Wikidata? I didn't really understand Meta.
[19:14:24] <wm-bb>	 <Jan_ainali> This short video might explain better: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHy63VOp0RQ (re @Марк: Hello. Why do we need Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia if there is Wikidata? I didn't really understand Meta.)
[19:31:14] <wm-bb>	 <Марк> Thank you. Can you do it in words? (re @Jan_ainali: This short video might explain better: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHy63VOp0RQ)
[19:31:44] <wm-bb>	 <Jan_ainali> I am pretty sure there are words in the video. (re @Марк: Thank you. Can you do it in words?)
[19:33:30] <wm-bb>	 <Jan_ainali> It has subtitles and transcription (if you click the "More" in the descriptions), so you can read it there too if you want it in writing. But I won't copy paste it into this chat. (re @Jan_ainali: I am pretty sure there are words in the video.)
[19:43:35] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> Chapter 10.5 in this paper discusses this in more depth: https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.04733 (re @Марк: Hello. Why do we need Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia if there is Wikidata? I didn't really understand Meta.)
[19:44:13] <wm-bb>	 <vrandecic> In short, Wikidata can only express a limited amount of knowledge. Abstract Wikipedia aims to extend that.