[00:06:23] [[User:Feeglgeef/NoCopy.js]] (re @Nikki: gahhhh does anyone know if there's a way to stop it from copying the id if I click on it?) [00:06:37] yeah, I'm not opposed to a button or dropdown menu or something, my issue is that it looks like text but does something I don't expect text to do. I know it does that and still keep accidentally triggering it [00:11:19] I have a similar problem with the links that look like text and the text that should be a link but isnโ€™t ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ (re @Nikki: yeah, I'm not opposed to a button or dropdown menu or something, my issue is that it looks like text but does something I don't ...) [00:16:05] https://youtu.be/Pqkwa7X_XlQ?si=3jFjItsC1pw9sKJ6 [00:16:17] clicking text also doesn't seem very accessible... can't tab to it with the keyboard, screenreader probably won't tell you that it's clickable, it doesn't have any title text but even if it did, you wouldn't be able to see it when using a touchscreen or keyboard (and possibly not with a screenreader either) [00:29:41] Yes, all the options should be in a Tools menu. Copying the ID is just the only option so farโ€ฆ (re @Nikki: clicking text also doesn't seem very accessible... can't tab to it with the keyboard, screenreader probably won't tell you that ...) [04:39:43] "Applications programming is a race between software engineers, who strive to produce idiot-proof programs, and the universe which strives to produce bigger idiots. So far the Universe is winning." - Rick Cook [06:22:02] What's that trashy notice atop Wikifunctions page? [06:22:04] Why it's in Hebrew despite my interface language is English?! [06:22:08] T372842 I guess [06:22:12] ื•ื™ืงื™ืคื•ื ืงืฆื™ื•ืช ื”ื•ื ืžื™ื–ื ื—ื“ืฉ ืฉืœ ืงืจืŸ ื•ื™ืงื™ืžื“ื™ื”, ืฉื ืžืฆื ื›ืขืช ื‘ืคื™ืชื•ื—. ื—ืœืง ืžื”ื™ื›ื•ืœื•ืช ื‘ืคื™ืชื•ื—. ื ื™ืชืŸ ืœืžืฆื•ื ืžื™ื“ืข ื ื•ืกืฃ ืขืœ ื”ืžื™ื–ื ื‘ืžื˜ืึพื•ื™ืงื™. [06:22:14] On [[Wikifunctions:FAQ]] [06:22:16] not a new problem (re @amire80: And yes, I think that it's wrong in any case, and I reported https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T372842) [06:22:18] Yes, I cannot read Hebrew... [06:22:30] And neither my system nor my Wikifunctions is Hebrew by default [12:59:12] We should probably return only objects with identifiable types. A typed map seems like a good choice if the object is not a well-formed Wikifunctions object. We might consider supporting the return of a Wikifunctions object in canonical form, but that might be a specific custom type. (re @wmtelegram_bot: I'm sure there was a good reason to implement it that way, [12:59:12] but proba [12:59:12] bly not. Feel free to suggest improvements here; the...) [14:25:49] Yeah, I would be ok with this being a custom type. Depending on how types for Abstract Wikipedia is done, it might require being able to return objects with JSON, so we might need this anyway (re @Al: We should probably return only objects with identifiable types. A typed map seems like a good choice if the object is not a well...) [14:45:57] More like https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T372684 , but these things are quite possibly related. (re @mahir256: not a new problem) [20:33:14] https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/5686e332/file_66755.jpg [22:26:10] Feeglgeef Why did you add Reference year to Z20290? [22:28:42] It'd be useful? (re @Al: Feeglgeef Why did you add Reference year to Z20290?) [22:28:44] Idk [22:30:50] It would be a different functionโ€ฆ The start day is simply a function of the year itself, nothing else (that I can think of) (re @Feeglgeef: It'd be useful?) [22:31:18] Ok, fair, you can remove it (re @Al: It would be a different functionโ€ฆ The start day is simply a function of the year itself, nothing else (that I can think of)) [22:31:38] Will do, thanks ๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿ‘ (re @Feeglgeef: Ok, fair, you can remove it) [22:37:15] It has Z20290 as an implementation. Could you remove that please? (re @Feeglgeef: Ok, fair, you can remove it) [22:37:55] You mean Z20289? [22:38:11] ๐Ÿ—ฟ [22:38:17] Yeah (re @Al: It has Z20290 as an implementation. Could you remove that please?) [22:38:30] I do, sorry [22:39:27] And sorry about putting it there (re @Al: It has Z20290 as an implementation. Could you remove that please?) [22:39:44] I was just messing around [22:41:09] Done [22:44:32] Thank you. I think weโ€™re back up and running correctly now. (re @Feeglgeef: Done) [23:38:55] I don't know what I've done wrong here - I thought it would be simple: Z20324 [23:40:03] oh, nevermind, advance N has an integer input type. That's probably it. (re @Toby: I don't know what I've done wrong here - I thought it would be simple: Z20324) [23:40:04] Z17420 accepts one input :) [23:40:29] nvm lol [23:44:23] Z20323 is cool, it's based off of a 3b1b video, but I can't find it so maybe I hallucinated it. [23:45:22] Anybody know what I'm doing wrong?? : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/06c25e28/file_66756.jpg [23:46:57] corporate needs to ask somebody to find the difference between these pictures [23:49:52] It used to be a timeout in the result validation, which equality function are you using? (re @Feeglgeef: Anybody know what I'm doing wrong??) [23:51:40] It's passing now (re @Al: It used to be a timeout in the result validation, which equality function are you using?)