[01:51:35] <wm-bb>	 <Toby> I see this text near the bottom of the main page "<ǃ--Maybe add back foundation wiki? There's a thing here where whether or not the grid is displayed as 4x4 or sometimes a 5x3/3x5 so either way one looks really bad. -->" (re @Feeglgeef: Any coloring suggestions for the main page? Other than media and links it's completely monochrome right now)
[02:14:44] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> K (re @Toby: I see this text near the bottom of the main page "<ǃ--Maybe add back foundation wiki? There's a thing here where whether or not ...)
[02:14:53] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> I added that
[02:15:10] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> Not sure what you are trying to say
[02:15:49] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> It's like really really annoying. On some devices it looks normal but on some it doesn't
[02:16:23] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> Ahh fuck I fucked that up really fucking badly
[02:19:19] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> Ah I see what I did
[02:19:26] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> Thanks for catching that
[04:06:40] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8Fr8eP8/
[05:50:40] <wm-bb>	 <Toby> Can someone help check this test: Z21411. I'm getting the binaries from [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-precision_floating-point_format]] and putting the pieces through Z21163 and Z12982 to get the components of the float64. All the tests were going well until this one...
[05:52:05] <wm-bb>	 <Toby> The line that Z21411 is replicating is "0 11111111110 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111112 ≙ 7FEF FFFF FFFF FFFF16 ≙ +21023 × (1 + (1 − 2−52)) ≈ 1.7976931348623157 × 10308 (Max. double)"
[06:42:35] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> Looks like a Canocialization issue from a really quick check. (re @Toby: Can someone help check this test: Z21411. I'm getting the binaries from [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-precision_floatin...)
[06:45:28] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> Hmm
[06:46:10] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> Ahh. The type converter is the issue here
[06:46:57] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> the math module doesn't like it when you try to use an exponent of 1023
[06:47:17] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> IIRC
[08:09:41] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> I've created Z21414 and Z21416 as examples of what abstract Constructors could look like on Wikifunctions
[08:10:46] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> I think it would be nice for constructor functions to be able to decide when to evaluate the constructor/function calls in it's inputs
[11:44:23] <wm-bb>	 <Toby> Good feedback. I've made a test that is difficult for the equality function: Z21420 (re @Feeglgeef: the math module doesn't like it when you try to use an exponent of 1023)
[18:23:59] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> @vrandecic can we get a validator for rational numbers?
[18:54:36] <wm-bb>	 <Al> I’m not sure what you mean. (re @Feeglgeef: I think it would be nice for constructor functions to be able to decide when to evaluate the constructor/function calls in it's ...)
[21:48:26] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> Like (re @Al: I’m not sure what you mean.)