[09:57:10] @mdaniels5757 it looks like Z6006 has one less key (and hence different key labels) than was planned at [[Wikifunctions:Type_proposals/Wikidata_lexeme_senses]]. Is the implemented version the final form? [10:11:30] Do you mean David ? (re @u99of9: @mdaniels5757 it looks like Z6006 has one less key (and hence different key labels) than was planned at [[Wikifunctions:Type_pro...) [10:18:48] Oops, yes! (re @Al: Do you mean David ?) [10:50:11] @vrandecic please can you add Z23130 as the equality function for Z6096? I can't imagine this one being controversial. [12:15:52] Anyone want to help with this: Z23143? Believe it or not, at the moment I think it is essential to rendering the future SI unit type (I got stuck trying to write a composition for Z23136). [12:29:57] Maybe later… What help do you need? (re @u99of9: Anyone want to help with this: Z23143? Believe it or not, at the moment I think it is essential to rendering the future SI unit...) [12:54:38] It turned out easier than I thought. The filter seems to work, I'm now trying the composition. Thanks anyway. (re @Al: Maybe later… What help do you need?) [13:04:55] And the composition now seems to hang together as far as I can tell, but times out, so some optimisation is needed, especially if this is one day going to be part of a display function! [15:11:16] 🤔 I guess it’s just a question of too many claims, especially for metre. Once the relevant subset is cached, it may become feasible, but I don’t think we’re caching embedded function call results. (re @u99of9: And the composition now seems to hang together as far as I can tell, but times out, so some optimisation is needed, especially i...) [15:56:11] Hey, thanks for pointing that out! That was an unintentional oversight, and "my bad". When I wrote the code that creates instances of Z6006, I was guided by what's in the JSON from Wikidata, and there is no element there for indicating the lexeme. However, this is now consistent with what we have in Z6004/lexeme form. I'll consider what might be the best way to handle [15:56:11] this, a [15:56:12] nd come back with a proposal. (re @u99of9: @mdaniels5757 it looks like Z6006 has one less key (and hence different key labels) than was planned at [[Wikifunctions:Type_pro...) [17:58:40] Thanks for calling this out. I've added this case to a list (currently just in a team document AFAIK) of Wikidata-object-related performance problems, which is driving analysis and planning of next steps on performance issues. (re @u99of9: And the composition now seems to hang together as far as I can tell, but times out, so some optimisation is needed, especially [17:58:40] i...) [22:16:27] I don't think I've seen this before (at Z22764). It looks like Al did something tricky with ZObjects in the return, so maybe it has found a way to break something. : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/fab985ac/file_68922.jpg [22:31:24] Tricky? Me?! 😱 It should just be returning a Z6, but I accept that won’t succeed with a generic type. I think I’d already disconnected that implementation before I added the test but I didn’t notice anything untoward at the time. (re @u99of9: I don't think I've seen this before (at Z22764). It looks like Al did something tricky with ZObjects in the return, so maybe it [22:31:24] ...) [22:50:51] Forwarded from Carl9bot: I deposited $100 by myself and allowed Mr Richard Mendez trade for me and I got my first payout of $1,000  within 24 hrs I can now understand why there are so many recommendations about him and I'm also recommending his services to you reading this post .. contact him via the link below. Don't miss out !!. [22:50:52] @TRADER_MENDEZ [23:12:08] I’ve forced it to return a string (and fail) 🤷‍♂️ (re @u99of9: I don't think I've seen this before (at Z22764). It looks like Al did something tricky with ZObjects in the return, so maybe it ...) [23:14:11] I thought it was an interesting curiosity that might help the devs better reinforce the interface. I didn't mean to make you withdraw it. (re @Al: I’ve forced it to return a string (and fail) 🤷‍♂️) [23:24:47] It was “withdrawn” already, I just hadn’t decided whether to request deletion or upgrade it for Typed lists. The problem, as I understand it, is that the Z4K1 of a generic function is a function call, which should not be returned as the Z6K1 of an explicit Z6 object. I would expect a type mismatch error but I’ve no idea why it decided to hang instead (if, indeed, it did). [23:24:48] [23:24:49] (re @u99of9: I thought it was an interesting curiosity that might help the devs better reinforce the interface. I didn't mean to make you wit...)