[07:12:12] <wm-bb>	 <Al> Thanks, David. I agree that union types would be an improvement, but there are other avenues  that we should explore. Perhaps at [[Wikifunctions talk:Support for Wikidata content]]?
[07:12:12] <wm-bb>	 <Al> Meanwhile, hinting in the labels seems best. I would go with a “…reference…” option. “subject (reference)” or “Wikidata reference” would be suitably concise. I would be wary of abandoning the “subject” at this stage, however, and I’m not convinced that adding “entity” helps. If it does, I think I’d prefer “subject entity (reference)” or “subject <clipped message>
[07:12:14] <wm-bb>	 <Al> entity (Wikidata reference)” because, as I see it, it’s the subject entity’s reference rather than the subject’s entity reference (whatever that might be taken to mean). (re @David: Yes, the type for subject and for value has to be Z1, to allow for the different types.  One day we'll be able to do better, whe...)
[12:35:02] <wm-bb>	 <Al> I did me some thinking and made Z23694. I used it to make Z23702. Any thoughts?
[20:21:41] <wm-bb>	 <Al> There seems to be something wrong with typed list’s going into Python. Z17616, for example, completes in under 1s with JavaScript but times out after 9s in Python. From inserted debugs, the Python function appears not to start. On March 27, the Python implementation was demoted by WikiLambda system, so that may be when the time outs began.