[13:08:33] What is a "persisted function call"? [13:09:29] The word "persistent" is in the glossary, but not "persisted", and it is a bit unusual as an adjective. [13:10:04] It appears in several new WikiLambda messages, like "Create new persisted Function Call" (a user right). [13:54:38] It is a Z2/persistent object whose Z4/type is Z7/function call. “Persisted” is a participle, broadly synonymous with “saved” or “published”. The value of different terminology is doubtful, but if you have the right to create a new “persisted function call”, you will need to click “Publish” before the new function call object begins to become “persisted” a message> [13:54:39] s a persistent object. (re @amire80: What is a "persisted function call"?) [16:21:49] I think it still ought to be "persistent function call" (re @Al: It is a Z2/persistent object whose Z4/type is Z7/function call. “Persisted” is a participle, broadly synonymous with “saved” or ...) [16:23:12] Only staff (re @amire80: On Type pages, the technical stuff is, AFAIK, edited by very advanced people (only staff), but I might be wrong.) [17:00:58] Yeah, otherwise it sounds like it is done persisting. (re @Feeglgeef: I think it still ought to be "persistent function call") [17:26:59] someone in wikinews asks: we dont have wikidata linked to articles, how does it affect participation in abstract wikipedia? and the licence incompativbility between enwiki and enwn? [17:27:00] https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Wikinews:Water_cooler/miscellaneous#RfC_ongoing_regarding_Abstract_Wikipedia_(and_your_project) [17:27:30] (i have no clue on either) [17:30:22] 1. It doesn't [17:30:22] 2. (opinion) Licensing should be consistent with the project you want to work on. (re @SvetaT23: someone in wikinews asks: we dont have wikidata linked to articles, how does it affect participation in abstract wikipedia? and ...) [18:01:17] I'll take this, no problem (re @SvetaT23: someone in wikinews asks: we dont have wikidata linked to articles, how does it affect participation in abstract wikipedia? and ...) [18:01:51] Short version: there is no problem with licensing and if they don't want to use Wikifunctions or Abstract Wikipedia, for us is fine