[05:08:58] <wm-bb>	 <u99of9> I'm afraid I'm only looking at the surface level. Are you saying there's a different bug you could report? (re @Al: Is the problem here that the interpretation is inconsistent? Z24076 passes but should probably fail because what is returned is ...)
[07:34:42] <wm-bb>	 <Al> Something’s not right 🤷‍♂️ Z24077 apparently succeeds with Z23421 but *presumably* the implementation is not returning a Wikidata item reference, *as such*, just something that functions in the same way in testing. But the object returned is rejected if it is supplied more directly to Z6821, even though it doesn’t appear to be identified as invalid up front. (re @u99
[07:34:42] <wm-bb>	 <clipped message>
[07:34:43] <wm-bb>	 <Al> of9: I'm afraid I'm only looking at the surface level. Are you saying there's a different bug you could now report?)
[09:54:25] <wm-bb>	 <Al> *T395308* (re @Al: Something’s not right 🤷‍♂️ Z24077 apparently succeeds with Z23421 but *presumably* the implementation is not returning a Wikidat...)
[15:04:57] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> Hallo
[15:05:19] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> I don't have a specific example, but I hope that I'll be able to explain it here:
[15:06:13] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> With code implementations, it's easy to copy Python or JavaScript code, paste it, and make some changes.
[15:06:18] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> Is the same possible with composition?
[15:07:09] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> Compositions aren't written as text, but selected as a dynamic form. Sometimes they are complex, with functions calling more nested functions.
[15:07:24] <wm-bb>	 <amire80> Is it possible to copy them? Or do they have to be recreated manually?
[17:11:24] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> Manually for now (re @amire80: Is it possible to copy them? Or do they have to be recreated manually?)
[17:11:58] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> Unless you use wikilambda editsource
[17:12:22] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> And that's still not convenient
[17:12:32] <wm-bb>	 <Feeglgeef> Nor officially supported