[09:37:09] I would say comment for now, as they will appear lowercase anyway when inputting the address in the bar (re @u99of9: For the proposals at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia/Abstract_Wikipedia_naming_contest/More_proposals, is a c...) [09:37:14] but that's me speaking [09:50:01] I don't have any proposal to make but (except - in some measure - Wikimedia Commons, tho it's sometimes called WikiCommons, and Wiktionary), all Wikimedia projects start with "Wiki" + smth, it would be nice for consistency to keep that [16:29:11] I proposed Wikiabstracts now. It is derived from Abstract Wikipedia. [21:17:52] I think consistency is overrated :) [21:22:27] The name I have in mind is "Wikipedia ____". The idea is Wikipedia with a modifier. "Wikipedia Rosetta" came to mind but that might be a trademark dispute (and too many syllables IMO) [21:22:44] If the modifier came first it might sound too much like a language edition of Wikipedia [21:28:05] Personally, I think I hear (and read) just Commons much more often than WikiCommons. So a "Wikimedia something" might just be fine. And writing this made me submit Wikimedia Babel as a proposal. (re @NicolasVIGNERON: I don't have any proposal to make but (except - in some measure - Wikimedia Commons, tho it's sometimes called WikiCommons, and ...) [21:29:23] @Sannita Can you vote on multiple names or only one? [21:32:47] In the first round of voting you may vote for as many names as you like. [21:32:48] From [[n:Abstract_Wikipedia/Abstract_Wikipedia_naming_contest#Voting_eligibility_and_rules]] (re @harej: @Sannita Can you vote on multiple names or only one?) [21:34:11] I find Wikipedia confusing as we can also make content for Wikivoyage, Wiktionary etc there. (re @harej: The name I have in mind is "Wikipedia ____". The idea is Wikipedia with a modifier. "Wikipedia Rosetta" came to mind but that mi...) [21:53:53] You can vote on how many proposals you want (re @harej: @Sannita Can you vote on multiple names or only one?)