[00:33:42] <wm-bb>	 <u99of9> I think you're correct.
[00:48:05] <wm-bb>	 <u99of9> I had an idea: T407932
[10:11:56] <wm-bb>	 <Al> Nice. I’ve commented on the ticket but I’m not sure they are duplicated languages. Clearly we need to distinguish the no-conversion case, but beyond that, whatever works!
[10:11:57] <wm-bb>	 <Al> Something I avoided mentioning is “alternative conversion” (converting Rationals to Python decimals, for example). If we had that, the no-conversion option could be implemented with minimalist converters. But then, we’d still have some sort of issue with default conversion. (re @u99of9: I had an idea: T407932)
[18:39:32] <wm-bb>	 <SvetaT23> I commented on the naming proposal. In my view should be not a "Wikipedia" centric name if the generated content is useful to other wikis.
[22:54:43] <wm-bb>	 <u99of9> So the ideal would be that when creating a code implementation, each of the inputs and the output has a selector to choose from a zid-enun of available conversion functions? I fear that would be quite hard for the novice users. (re @Al: Nice. I’ve commented on the ticket but I’m not sure they are duplicated languages. Clearly we need to distinguish the no-convers...)