[07:23:50] <wm-bb>	 <Al> I hadn’t conceived of that degree of granularity. If we were to go down that route, we would generally be using the default converters, so the user would only have to choose an alternate when they knew they wanted to. (re @u99of9: So the ideal would be that when creating a code implementation, each of the inputs and the output has a selector to choose from ...)
[19:15:16] <wm-bb>	 <Ameisenigel> @vrandecic I have removed some entries at [[m:Abstract Wikipedia/Abstract Wikipedia naming contest/More proposals]] that have been listed twice.
[21:17:01] <wm-bb>	 <Sannita> thank you! (re @Ameisenigel: @vrandecic I have removed some entries at [[m:Abstract Wikipedia/Abstract Wikipedia naming contest/More proposals]] that have be...)
[23:38:59] <wm-bb>	 <waldyrious> Is there any explicit rule to determine which entries get promoted to the main list vs the More proposals page? E.g. currently "Wikimedia Babel" has 6 support votes but is tucked away in the More proposals page, whereas "Wikipedia Babel" is in the main contest page despite only having 4 support votes. It seems all proposals in the main page have at least 3 support
[23:38:59] <wm-bb>	 votes. Is that <clipped message>
[23:39:00] <wm-bb>	 <waldyrious> the rule that's been used so far? I'd be happy to help move the pages as they reach the threshold, but I need confirmation about what the threshold is :)
[23:54:23] <wm-bb>	 <waldyrious> Ah, wait, the example I gave is not correct — Wikimedia Babel is actually in the main page already. But still, it would still be nice to know what rule is being used to move proposals to the first round voting page, since then more people could help with maintenance of the contest.