[00:04:50] This search used to work. Once every now and again I go through replacing all the "->" with "→" : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/0609ea0c/file_75236.jpg [08:11:39] Regular search (as depicted) treats an initial ‘-‘ as a NOT and ignores ‘>‘ as punctuation. The predictive search will find ‘->’ in object labels. (re @u99of9: This search used to work. Once every now and again I go through replacing all the "->" with "→") [08:30:26] Has the regular search changed? [08:33:41] Do you know for sure that there should be some hits? I mean, this is what would be expected if there were no new -> since you last checked, right? (re @u99of9: This search used to work. Once every now and again I go through replacing all the "->" with "→") [08:33:45] Not that I’m aware of, not in this regard in any event. [08:33:46] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:CirrusSearch (re @u99of9: Has the regular search changed?) [08:33:48] Maybe I was using predictive before? [08:34:44] I don't do it often. There are always heaps of new ones. And the predictive bar does show them present now (re @Jan_ainali: Do you know for sure that there should be some hits? I mean, this is what would be expected if there were no new -> since you la...) [08:35:43] I also get this, which I didn't expect : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/d5015ad6/file_75237.jpg [08:37:36] There are thousands – mostly translation tags – but you won’t see them unless you add a searchable term as well. (re @Jan_ainali: Do you know for sure that there should be some hits? I mean, this is what would be expected if there were no new -> since you la...) [08:45:41] You could try « insource:/→/ » but it’s not recommended because it is resource heavy. There were 1050 results in the main namespace. (re @Jan_ainali: I also get this, which I didn't expect) [09:02:51] Sounds like work for a bot! [09:02:53] I was hoping that the pattern in Z28032 would work, and it was already mentioned -- did this resolve? (re @u99of9: Thanks for trying this out at Z29333 @dvd_ccc27919. I've fixed your test and it works, but unfortunately I had to write a helper...) [09:33:12] Yes the most pressing cases are resolved with any finite Apply now possible. [21:44:24] Can someone explain if this is intended? [21:44:24] When I call https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z23451 and pass in https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q471726 and choose the property `has edition or translation`, it clearly has 3 values and 1 of the highest rank is the top one. Yet the function returns the second one. Unless I am misunderstanding something it's wrong? [22:15:35] Yes, it’s wrong… I‘m fixing the obvious problem. (re @GrimRob: Can someone explain if this is intended? [22:15:36] When I call https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z23451 and pass in https://www.wikid...) [22:24:01] Z29424 (re @Al: Yes, it’s wrong… I‘m fixing the obvious problem.) [22:48:34] Thank you everyone [22:48:35] happy to be here 🥰 (re @Sannita: Welcome to the new people from Tyap Wikipedia ❤️) [22:59:22] @sNappy_ml inserisci il numero o verrai bannato [23:00:05] for the others, I know the guy, he's alright [23:00:10] 0484 [23:00:20] thank you!! (re @Sannita: @sNappy_ml inserisci il numero o verrai bannato) [23:05:19] Hi to all and thank you in advance, I am here for a quick help for my first very basic implementation by Composition ☺️: [23:05:19] https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z29422 [23:05:21] Why it does give me "void" result? If I implement it in the topmost function (Z20841) testing feature by calling the functions as I do in the implementation, it works (BTW, the first time it did not worked, actually, but now it always works). [23:16:52] Your floor function returns an integer but the function’s return type is a natural number. (re @sNappy_ml: Hi to all and thank you in advance, I am here for a quick help for my first very basic implementation by Composition ☺️: [23:16:52] https:/...) [23:49:49] Thank you! It worked. So, it's strict, fine. (Then, I don't know if it is the best way to implement, and many other things that I will learn). (re @Al: Your floor function returns an integer but the function’s return type is a natural number.)