[15:56:53] @NicolasVIGNERON, hello. This Amir's message is the answer to your last reply (https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/User_talk:Nyuhn#c-VIGNERON-20251103095100-Nyuhn-20251102103700) on my talk page. A variation of the so-called "carrot-colored problem". We have multiple lexemes for the same Wikidata item of Q4602749 (L179134-S3 and L245942-S2). Anyone have any ideas of how [15:56:53] to disting [15:56:54] uish them? (re @amire80: Well, so here we have a problem that is a similar problem to the "carrot-color" that I mentioned above. The word at L144878 (кон...) [16:26:01] According to their “lexical category”, one is a “numeral” and the other is a “noun” 🤷‍♂️ (re @nyuhn: @NicolasVIGNERON, hello. This Amir's message is the answer to your last reply on my talk page. A variation of the so-called "car...) [16:39:48] not sure to fully understand... [16:39:48] having lexemes that are synonyms (more or less close) happens a lot, that can be painfull but nothing unexpected, there is a lot of ways to mitiagte the issue of "which one to select" (including but not limited to the lexcial category) (re @nyuhn: @NicolasVIGNERON, hello. This Amir's message is the answer to your last reply on my talk page. A variation of the [16:39:48] so-called "car...) [16:40:56] and your functions still confuse me a lot [17:54:21] As other people are saying, this is probably one of the relatively easier things to resolve. They are different parts of speech, the senses are defined quite well, and at least in theory, each of these can be linked to a distinct item. (re @nyuhn: @NicolasVIGNERON, hello. This Amir's message is the answer to your last reply on my talk page. A variation of the [17:54:21] so-called "car...) [22:03:03] Any idea how I can improve Z29551 to make Z27269 passing the test? [22:25:29] Since both L489196-S1 and L34718-S3 have P5137 Q197, it's even hard for Z27327 to distinguish them, but I think that's the way forward. It might mean that you either need to tweak Z27332, or edit the Vogel lexeme to deprioritise it (e.g. by adding "rare" to that sense). (re @Ameisenigel: Any idea how I can improve Z29551 to make Z27269 passing the test?) [22:28:08] Here's a test to sort out: Z29553 (re @u99of9: Since both L489196-S1 and L34718-S3 have P5137 Q197, it's even hard for Z27327 to distinguish them, but I think that's the way f...)