[00:37:13] <玉平> Abstract Wikipedia / Wikifunctions. Please write a message with the numbers and/or letters that appear in this image to verify that you are a human. If you don't solve this captcha in 5 min, you will be automatically kicked out of the group [09:12:39] Interesting. I tried searching for Z89 (https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z89), but got void? See [09:12:40] https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z23072?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z23072%22%2C%22Z23072K1%22%3A%22Z89%22%2C%22Z23072K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z40%22%2C%22Z40K1%22%3A%22Z41%22%7D%7D (re @Al: Yes, that one comes from Z23072. There are several variations at different places in the catalogue. In this call, the first elem...) [09:15:00] I searched quickly for an URL type but did not find any. Is that something we want? [09:15:00] As a contributor I would like to output a clickable url from a function. [09:17:30] More worrying than interesting. It looks like Python is down. (re @Npriskorn: Interesting. I tried searching for Z89, but got void? See [09:17:31] https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z23072?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z...) [09:22:59] I asked chatgpt to translate to js, see Z29967 (re @wikilinksbot: Z23072 – function searches from Type) [09:23:25] get this though so maybe JS down too? [09:23:27] https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/e8d0fabd/file_75773.jpg [09:23:44] lets build it using composition 🤪 [09:25:01] Probably. These functions pre-date HTML fragments, but that type doesn’t yet display as a clickable link from a call in the UI. I’m hoping we’ll get this from *T358807*. (re @Npriskorn: I searched quickly for an URL type but did not find any. Is that something we want? [09:25:01] As a contributor I would like to output a cl...) [09:36:16] JavaScript seems to be mostly okay now 🤷‍♂️ The Python code wasn’t a great place to start, I have to admit! (re @Npriskorn: get this though so maybe JS down too?) [09:39:20] Has the outage been reported? I see orchestrator timeouts at something simple like Z28099 [09:42:55] Not yet. Z15788 and Z10004 time out, so it looks pretty comprehensive. (re @u99of9: Has the outage been reported? I see orchestrator timeouts at something simple like Z28099) [09:45:04] T406848 is still open… [09:45:57] @Sannita can you raise the alert? (re @Al: Not yet. Z15788 and Z10004 time out, so it looks pretty comprehensive.) [09:56:56] T406848#11417633 (re @u99of9: @Sannita can you please raise the alert?) [10:23:09] I can tomorrow, today is Sunday and no one is around (re @u99of9: @Sannita can you please raise the alert?) [11:30:26] Z30000 is in place, but I've left a mess of untested and approximated helper functions, so it will take a while to make it work! [12:39:47] New subcategory page for HTML operations : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/1fdc7006/file_75775.jpg [12:41:05] I suggest removing this page (it is too broad and has little content) and moving the 2 functions to the Miscellaneous page. Any reactions to this? : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/710587e6/file_75776.jpg [13:21:41] I’ve no objection. I was planning to accumulate functions like Z23312 under https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Catalogue/Type_handling#Key_accessors. (re @Npriskorn: I suggest removing this page (it is too broad and has little content) and moving the 2 functions to the Miscellaneous page. Any ...) [13:28:49] I just read the suggestion by @vrandecic to simplify with 6 overall categories and I like that suggestion. Dunno how to get it mobile and desktop friendly. [13:28:51] Perhaps a new gallery with these categories in the top to replace the current one? [13:42:00] I don’t think there was a consensus to replace the current organisation. Even if there were, I’d retain it for a transitional period. (re @Npriskorn: I just read the suggestion by @vrandecic to simplify with 6 overall categories and I like that suggestion. Dunno how to get it m...) [13:50:01] I ageee, I'll make a copy and work on that with Denny and we will see if it will be an alternative or replacement. 😀 (re @Al: I don’t think there was a consensus to replace the current organisation. Even if there were, I’d retain it for a transitional pe...) [14:28:33] @vrandecic how does this look to you? [14:28:33] Which symbols is suitable in the logos for each category? [14:28:36] https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/adc84f8c/file_75778.jpg [16:44:42] it seems that we can get an emergency fix for this, I'll keep you posted (re @wikilinksbot: T406848#11417633 – wide-scale Python failure [open]) [20:42:32] Fix is underway, but it's held up by our CI, unfortunately. [20:59:58] Is it correct that I don't have the right to create a Error type [21:01:15] It says "You don't have the right to create a new instance of an Enum type " : https://tools-static.wmflabs.org/bridgebot/348a12cb/file_75787.jpg [21:03:14] IIRC no, you cannot create an error [21:03:27] Why? (re @Sannita: IIRC no, you cannot create an error) [21:07:14] Still IIRC this is something that the dev team wanted to keep a check on, but I think you can suggest new errors (re @dvd_ccc27919: Why?) [21:49:41] Thanks for noticing this! You should be allowed to create error types without special privileges. However, this points to a bug that interprets error types as enums. It'll be a very quick fix, you can track it in here T411332 (re @dvd_ccc27919: It says "You don't have the right to create a new instance of an Enum type ") [22:20:31] Unfortunately, the change I would need to make in order to do a deployment cannot pass CI, so I can't just merge it without approval. A fix will have to wait for tomorrow. [22:22:14] Actually, never mind. There's an image I can use to redeploy now. [22:48:57] Okay! It has been redeployed. [23:20:05] Is it working for others? For me it worked for about 5 minutes, but then when I added this new test Z30048 it said I had too many functions running (possibly true, but I thought I'd seen results for the previous ones), then changed to orchestrator timeout. Then when I nudged the function above, it failed the other tests too (which had just succeeded prior to adding [23:20:05] the new test [23:20:06] ). (re @wmtelegram_bot: Okay! It has been redeployed.) [23:31:55] When you get to the very special bit of the Volunteer's corner, note that the software may have trouble with a couple of the votes "0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0" and "1 - 5" (re @vrandecic: Newsletter 228 [23:31:55] * Vote for the new wiki name! Voting is open until Monday [23:31:57] * Finishing each other’s sentences: “A lipoma is a beni...)