[05:12:24] Thanks! I've connected all of them. (re @Npriskorn: David all tests pass but none are connected on Z808) [05:14:14] Thanks again. I haven't found time to look at Z30615. When you say it's an error, do you think it should be deleted or it needs further work? (re @Al: Actually, Z30615 is an error.) [05:24:21] Do you mean it should fail so that we don't create invalid data? (re @Al: Actually, Z30615 is an error.) [05:31:58] Heads up – the coding has been done to address both of these issues. Sadly and regrettably, however, because of holidays and their impact on deployment schedules, these patches won't actually be deployed until January 7. Re: (1), the implementation of Z6003 has been updated to recognize the equivalence of the 2 different representations. Re: (2), the built-in fetch [05:31:58] function [05:31:58] s have been updated to always provide values for Z6003K5 and Z6003K6 (so, there will be an empty list where before the key was completely omitted). (re @David: So AIUI these 2 issues have turned up when comparing statements: [05:32:00] (1) Sometimes enum instances are represented with type + identi...) [05:34:22] Heads up – the coding has been done to address both of these issues. Sadly and regrettably, however, because of holidays and their impact on deployment schedules, these patches won't actually be deployed until January 7. Re: (1), the implementation of Z6003 has been updated to recognize the equivalence of the 2 different representations. Re: (2), the built-in fetch [05:34:22] function [05:34:22] s have been updated to always provide values for Z6003K5 and Z6003K6 (so, there will be an empty list where before the key was completely omitted). (re @David: So AIUI these 2 issues have turned up when comparing statements: [05:34:24] (1) Sometimes enum instances are represented with type + identi...) [07:02:15] /delete@wikilinksbot (re @wikilinksbot: Z6003 – Wikidata statement [07:02:16] Z6003K5 – Wikidata statement [07:02:18] Z6003K6 – Wikidata statement) [07:03:17] Thanks for keeping us updated ♥️ (re @David: Heads up – the coding has been done to address both of these issues. Sadly and regrettably, however, because of holidays and th...) [10:39:26] It’s a new test, so I wouldn’t delete it right away. It’s not entirely clear what the contributor intended, but “Z5” is not valid in Z39K1, so there is a failure to create a valid Z7. The result is not as helpful as it might be: ‘Unable to convert to canonical form (path to the problem: "Z22K2.K1.K1.K2.Z5K2.Z560K1.Z99K1.Z22K1.undefined")’. The test appears to pass, [10:39:26] [10:39:27] because the result validation is just “is void” (Z17180). I’ve changed this so that it now expects an object with Z5 as its type, so it now fails, as expected. (re @David: Thanks again. I haven't found time to look at Z30615. When you say it's an error, do you think it should be deleted or it need...) [13:36:29] It’s an invalid attempt to create an invalid object (presumably). I believe that it is impossible to create an object without Z1K1 as its first key, but I haven’t tried very hard! Once you specify the type correctly, you’re somewhat constrained by the type specification, so it should not be possible to create an object with a key that its type does not specify. On the [13:36:30] other [13:36:30] hand, it’s perfectly possible to create an object containing a reference to a non-existent object, (https [13:36:30] //www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z808?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z808%22%2C%22Z808K1%22%3A%5B%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z882%22%2C%22Z882K1%22%3A%22Z39%22%2C%22Z882K2%22%3A%22Z1%22%7D%2C%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22% [13:36:31] 3A%22Z882%22%2C%22Z882K1%22%3A%22Z39%22%2C%22Z882K2%22%3A%22Z1%22%7D%2C%22K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z39%22%2C%22Z39K1%22%3A%22Z1K1%22%7D%2C%22K2%22%3A%5B%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z882%22%2C%22Z882K1%22%3A%22Z39%22%2C%22Z882K2%22%3A%22Z1%22%7D%2C%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z882%22%2C%22Z882K1%22%3A%22Z39%22%2C%22Z882K2%22%3A% [13:36:31] 22Z1%22 [13:36:33] %7D%2C%22K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z39%22%2C%22Z39K1%22%3A%22Z1K1%22%7D%2C%22K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6%22%2C%22Z6K1%22%3A%22Z9%22%7D%7D%2C%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z882%22%2C%22Z882K1%22%3A%22Z39%22%2C%22Z882K2%22%3A%22Z1%22%7D%2C%22K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z39%22%2C%22Z39K1%22%3A%22Z9K1%22%7D%2C%22K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6%22%2C [13:36:33] %22Z6K1 [13:36:34] %22%3A%22Z10%22%7D%7D%5D%7D%5D%7D) so long as the reference has a valid form. I’ve added this call to [[Talk:Z808]]. [15:43:51] welcome @taikeho 👋😀