[13:23:17] <wm-bb>	 <Npriskorn> I cannot edit the en label here. Z17741 no errors in the console. seems like a JS bug to me
[13:31:12] <wm-bb>	 <Al> What are you proposing to change it to? (re @Npriskorn: I cannot edit the en label here in firefox. Z17741 no errors in the console. seems like a JS bug to me)
[13:36:37] <wm-bb>	 <NicolasVIGNERON> I tried and succed to edit the description (changed the first letter to lowercase) (re @Npriskorn: I cannot edit the en label here in firefox. Z17741 no errors in the console. seems like a JS bug to me)
[13:36:48] <wm-bb>	 <NicolasVIGNERON> not sure what to change on the label (except for doing a test/dummy edit)
[13:37:04] <wm-bb>	 <Npriskorn> /-en -> /-eln (in the end) (re @Al: What are you proposing to change it to?)
[13:38:16] <wm-bb>	 <NicolasVIGNERON> oh, I see the problem, the label is already too long
[13:38:25] <wm-bb>	 <NicolasVIGNERON> that's why you can't add letters ;)
[13:39:11] <wm-bb>	 <NicolasVIGNERON> if you try to edit to "Swedish noun, 3rd decl., definite sing., -en/-eln" then it should work
[13:49:43] <wm-bb>	 <NicolasVIGNERON> which reminds me that we still need to clean too long labels and descriptions: [[Wikifunctions:Long labels and descriptions]]
[13:56:36] <wm-bb>	 <Al> The static list hasn’t been updated since September. Since there was never a community consensus on what the limit should be, and broad agreement that it should be a bit longer, I don’t consider it a current priority. (re @NicolasVIGNERON: which reminds me that we still need to clean too long labels and descriptions: [[Wikifunctions:Long labels and descriptions]])
[13:58:35] <wm-bb>	 <NicolasVIGNERON> agreed, it was just a reminder that these objects can't be edited
[13:58:37] <wm-bb>	 <NicolasVIGNERON> and some of them are really long (like Z11568 : 130 / 50 !) (re @Al: The static list hasn’t been updated since September. Since there was never a community consensus on what the limit should be, an...)
[14:01:38] <wm-bb>	 <Al> If the list were re-done ordered by type and size descending (within language) maybe it would prioritise itself? 😉 (re @NicolasVIGNERON: agreed, it was just a reminder that these objects can't be edited
[14:01:38] <wm-bb>	 <Al> and some of them are really long (like Z11568 : 130 / 50 !))
[14:04:30] <wm-bb>	 <NicolasVIGNERON> oh, very good idea
[14:04:32] <wm-bb>	 <NicolasVIGNERON> ping @vrandecic would you be able to do it? (re @Al: If the list were re-done ordered by type and size descending (within language) maybe it would prioritise itself? 😉)
[14:09:22] <wm-bb>	 <NicolasVIGNERON> an other useful thing to find the best limit would be a list of all label containing a . (usually a sign of an abbreviation)
[14:15:19] <wm-bb>	 <Al> …or the longest alias, since that is likely to be what the desired content once was (bonus points for fuzzy matches, that could be a useful function in its own right) (re @NicolasVIGNERON: an other useful thing to find the best limit would be a list of all label containing a . (usually a sign of an abbreviation))
[19:34:11] <wm-bb>	 <Npriskorn> Is there a reasoning behind this arbitrary limit of labels? (re @NicolasVIGNERON: oh, I see the problem, the label is already too long)